Cerium LT vs Thorium AR

Arcteryx's Thorium AR [Men's - Women's] and Cerium LT [Men's - Women's] are their second and third warmest down jackets, coming right after the warmest down jacket Cerium SV [Men's - Women's - read my review] (excluding parkas here).

Try out the jacket finder tool at arcteryx.com and you'll see this yourself. 

Summary

Thorium AR vs Cerium LT comparison should come to your mind only if you're looking for a (1) multi-use jacket to use out in (2) cold and (3) dry weather. 

#Note: If this isn't you, stop reading this post here and go to my Arc'teryx Jackets Guide. 

Thorium AR Hoody is warmer and more weather resistant, however, it’s also quite a bit heavier (17.3 oz (490 g) vs 10.8 oz (305 g) than the Cerium LT. 

Another important difference is that Cerium LT offers a trim cut, and the Thorium AR a regular cut. 

Cerium LT uses a 850 fill power European grey goose down, whereas Thorium AR uses 750.

This value is in cubic inches, and represents the end volume the down eventually fully expands to when it's at rest.

The more the volume, the more air will be > trapped inside the down >  heated by your body > and ultimately work as an insulation.

That's why the higher the fill power, the warmer you'll feel inside the jacket provided that both jackets are filled with the same amount down.

That's why, in the end, this trade-off makes Thorium AR nearly 200 grams heavier than Cerium LT {(490 grams (1.1 lbs) vs 305 grams (0.7 lbs)} in return.

But I'd give relatively less importance to this weight difference, because as you can see here on Arc'teryx's own Naming Scheme Page, both Cerium and Thorium lines are on the lighter side.

Results

I'd say, generally speaking, when it's dry out, with only a long sleeved shirt under and without a shell on top, with a mild wind and very low to no activity level...

The approximate lowest temperatures where an average person can wear these jackets without feeling cold can be listed as:

• Cerium LT: -8 deg C (17 deg F)
• Thorium AR: -13 deg C (8 deg F)

If you think you run hotter or colder than the average person, mentally shift these temperatures accordingly.

Important:

When/if it's fairly wet out, warmth provided by both jackets can and will drop significantly.

Due to the baggier cut, there's more air trapped between your body and the jacket, which works as a perfect extra insulation.

Baggier cut doesn't always equal more warmth. There's a fine balance and you can often go too baggy and eventually and let too much air circulate & end up providing even less warmth than with the trimmer case to begin with.

But Thorium AR is at the warmer side of this line and hence provides extra warmth leveraging its baggier cut.

Lastly, both offer the same hem length at 72 cm (28.3 inches).

If you think Cerium LT would really work for you if only it could stand against colder days {below -8 deg C (17 deg F)}, then you might better checking out Cerium SV post of mine.

Cerium SV is warmer than Thorium AR by a good margin - standing up temperatures against as low as -20 deg C (-5 deg F). It's also only 400 grams (15 oz) at total - 100 grams (3.5 oz) lighter than Thorium AR.

Cerium LT uses a thinner, lighter fabric on the outer shell (Arato 10) compared to Thorium AR (Arato 30).

This is the biggest downside of not only the LT model but also the other two (SV, SL) Cerium models. 

Cerium LT isn't designed to be worn as an outer shell in harsh conditions. It's face is quite fragile - it can even get torn by something what would otherwise be a harmless rub for a rather robust jacket like the Atom AR.

Arato 30 of Thorium AR is absolutely more wind resistant, water resistant and durable than the Cerium LT - but still not nearly as robust jackets like Atom AR or Patagonia's Nano Puff and Micro Puff Jackets. Atom LT and Proton LT are also better than these two in this department.

In dry conditions, Atom AR would be less warm than Thorium AR and more than Cerium LT.

But in wet conditions, being equipped with synthetic insulation rather than down, (also having a super robust outer shell) Atom AR would feel warmer than both of these jackets.

Thorium AR isn't windproof by any means either. It's only lightly wind-resistant.

That said, both are DWR coated.

DWR will be enough to repel some moisture and light rain.

About wearing them as a stand-alone piece, please don't let my language discourage you more than necessary though (especially for the Thorium AR).

As long as you're kind to these jackets and you won't be out in harsh wind and/or rain, you'll be perfectly fine.

If this is you, though, it probably means that you'll be wearing this jacket out in town vast majority of the time, so I'd also recommend you to consider getting either a Thorsen, Camosun or Therme.

If you're looking for a windproof AND down-insulated jacket that you CAN wear as an outer layer as well, then I'd recommend checking out the Ceres SV Parka or the Firebee AR Parka. Cerium SV won't work either.

If a down jacket isn't a must for you, then checking out my top Arc'teryx and Patagonia synthetic insulated jacket picks might help you.

Conclusion

It might sound oversimplified (it is), but it all really mostly comes down to your response to this question:

Will there be a lot of days below -8 deg C (17 deg F)?

• Yes: Get the Thorium AR. I'd recommend the one with the hoody.

• No: Get the Cerium LT. I'd recommend the one with the hoody.

Lastly, both Cerium LT and Thorium AR come with their own stuff sacks (plus points for travelers) with that of LT's being more compact due to higher quality (850 FP vs 750 FP) down fill.

Layering suggestions

I'd recommend layering these jackets with a hard shell. Beta AR [Read Review] would probably work pretty well with both.

A base layer is definitely less necessary than an outer layer, but if you'd like extra insulation, this baselayer of Arc'teryx can work pretty well.