Atom LT vs Cerium LT

Summary

The biggest difference between Atom LT and Cerium LT is in their insulators (Atom's synthetic insulation vs Cerium's down insulation). 

You can see this in Arc'teryx's Naming Scheme Guide here as well - for both for "Cerium" and "Atom", as well as the meaning of modifier "LT". 

In short, get the Atom LT for high output activities and/or use in damp areas. The Cerium LT would mostly be a better pick for stationary, casual use in cold and dry weather. 

Warmth

In terms of warmth, they perform similarly - with the Cerium LT being slightly superior (this might not even be noticeable though - see the temperature ratings below). 

Cerium LT is down insulated. Meaning that when it's wet outside, its warmth will drop significantly, because down loses its insulating power when it gets wet (unless you have an outer layer (shell) at the top). 

This is one of the disadvantages of down. 

The second downside is that down takes a longer time to dry. Another reason to use it only in dry areas. 

A third thing to consider for down jackets (which is the Cerium LT in our case) is that it typically takes longer for your body to warm up a down jacket compared to a synthetic jacket (Atom LT). 

You don’t get that instant warm effect with down.

The main downside of synthetic insulation, on the other hand, is that it requires more insulation to provide the same warmth of down - hence ultimately making the jacket heavier than down jackets. 

In wet conditions, though; that's another story (more on this a little bit later). 

Another important disadvantage you get with the synthetic insulated jackets is that they lose more of their initial insulating capability over time. Down insulation, on the other hand, can provide the same warmth for decades. 

This sums up the essential differences you'd better know about synthetic vs down insulated jackets. 

Results

I'd say, generally speaking, when it's dry out, with only a long sleeved shirt under and without a shell on top, with a mild wind and very low to no activity level...

The approximate lowest temperatures where an average person can wear these jackets without feeling cold can be listed as:

• Cerium LT: -8 deg C (17 deg F)
• Atom LT: -5 deg C (23 deg F)

If you think you run hotter or colder than the average person, mentally shift these temperatures accordingly.

Important:

When/if it's fairly wet out, Cerium LT's warmth will drop significantly and will end up around Atom and Proton LT's warmth range depending how wet it gets. 

Breathability

Atom line is designed for active use. Atom LT's side fleece panels will breath much more than the Cerium LT.  

Cerium LT, on the other hand, is mostly designed for casual uses. It breathes much less than the Atom LT. I'm 100% sure you wouldn't want to be wearing a Cerium LT when, for example, climbing or skiing.

Fit

Both the Atom LT and Cerium LT offer the same identical, trim fit. 

Face Fabric Differences

This is the biggest downside of not only the LT - but also the other two (SV and SL) models of Cerium.

Since it isn't meant to be worn as a stand-alone piece when it's wet or harsh out, the face fabric is just too fragile. It isn't abrasion resistant. Not wind or weather proof either.

Atom LT, on the other hand, is much better compared to the Cerium LT in this department - although still not as good as Atom AR, Patagonia Nano Puff or Patagonia Micro Puff. 

Also, both of these jackets are DWR coated. 

Although this helps Cerium with its water resistance, it just still doesn't cut it to bring it up to the Atom LT's water and weather protection level. 

Conclusion

If you'll be physically active, then don't get Cerium LT. Simple as that. As explained repeatedly in this post, it just really isn't designed for high output use. Get the Atom LT instead.