• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

OutdoorCrunch

  • BASICS
  • PRO TIPS
  • GEAR
    • JACKETS
      • INSULATED JACKETS
        • DOWN JACKETS
        • SYNTHETIC INSULATED JACKETS
      • SHELL JACKETS
        • HARDSHELL JACKETS
        • SOFTSHELL JACKETS
      • SKI JACKETS
      • PARKAS
      • RAIN JACKETS
      • WIND JACKETS
      • FLEECE JACKETS
    • BACKPACKS
    • COOKING
      • BACKPACKING STOVES
      • COOKWARE
    • FOOTWEAR
  • MISCELLANEOUS
  • ABOUT
    • ABOUT ME
    • CONTACT
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Footwear

Altra Timp vs Lone Peak

Last updated: July 21, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

We review and compare Altra's Timp and Lone Peak trail running shoes.

Altra Lone Peak 4.5's in their natural habitat.

A short answer first:

The most important difference is the extra cushioning the Timp 2.0 offers over the Lone Peak 4.5's.

A summary around the cushioning:

  • The Lone Peak is the closest you can get to a typical running shoe anatomy: Average cushioning, and hence also average underfoot protection and average ground feel. It's your safest bet.
  • The Timp, on the other hand, is more cushioned than the Lone Peak, but not by a huge amount - so the ground feel is sacrificed just slightly in return, and the underfoot protection is ended up being a little superior.

Lastly, this Grey/Blue color of Timp 2.0 and this Gray/Orange color of Lone Peak 4.5 are the most preferred color combinations. 

  • Both the Lone Peak and Timp got revised during late 2019!

I've also published posts regarding the changes going from Lone Peak 4.0 to 4.5, and the changes going from Timp 1.5 to Timp 2.0. So check them out if you're considering the previous versions.

I also contacted the Altra Customer Service about this, and shared the chat history at the bottom of this post, but the information given until that part also includes all the Rep's worth mentioning comments.

Altra Timp 1.5's.

Cushioning

Cushioning is an objective parameter, and the winner is clearly the Timp in this department.

If you were to line up all 5 Altra trail running shoes by the amount of their cushioning, Lone Peak's would be right in the middle.

And the Timp's, having a little more cushioning than the Lone Peak's, would be placed right next to the them.

So how does this cushion difference play out in practice?

If you're either:

  • Quite a bit on the heavier side (say, more than 190 lbs),
  • New to running/hiking,
  • Running/hiking on a relatively more rough and/or rocky trails,
  • Planning to run/hike mostly for long distances,
  • Prioritize underfoot protection and cushion over the ground feel,
  • Wishing to go easier on your joints (for any reason),
  • Not really wishing much traction...

...then the extra cushion in the Timp's are highly likely to make a positive difference for you - but not by a huge amount, because the Lone Peak's are also equipped with a fair amount of cushion.

Traction

This was my main beef with the Timp 1.5's, and it certainly is improved in Timp 2.0, but Lone Peak 4.5's are still a little bit superior in this department.

The traction performance of the Lone Peaks 4.5's isn't exceptional either, (especially when you consider a trail running shoe with mad traction capabilities such as this one), it's still noticeably better than the Timp's.

Outsole base of the Timp 1.5 (at the top) could have really used a more aggressively rough surface to ensure better traction - which most users also complained about. Seems like Altra heard of this and decided to update the Timp 2.0 from DuraTrac to MaxTrac.

So called "DuraTrac" traction technology of Timp 1.5 is outdated as of 2020 - especially compared to the "MaxTrac" traction technology of most recently updated Altra trail running shoes, including the Lone Peak 4.5's.

But still, although the outsole technology of the Timp 2.0 seem to catch up with the Lone Peak 4.5, due to the stack height it's still more prone to slippage.


First cushioning, and second traction performance is really how you should base your decision primarily off when having a dilemma between Timp's and Lone Peak's.

So I'd recommend you to make your decision based on this chart:

  • Max event distances for each Altra trail running shoe can pull off without making you feel uncomfortable...

 

Miles / km's 

Cushion

Bottom line

 

Olympus 4.0 (Men's - Women's)

75+/120+

High

Best for super long hours of standing, walking, hiking or trail running.

Read Review

Timp 2.0 (Men's - Women's)

75/120

Avg-high

2-in-1 one: Trail running and backpacking.

Read Review

Lone Peak 4.5 (Men's - Women's)

50/80

Avg

Safest bet. Closest you get to a typical running shoe anatomy, versatile.

Read Review

Superior 4.5 (Men's - Women's)

30/50

Avg-low

More of a minimalist, performance shoe.

Read Review

King MT 2.0 (Men's - Women's)

10/16

Low

Really performance oriented pick.

 

These are only approximate values assuming typical settings. If you think you;

  • Are heavier than the average person,
  • Relatively less conditioned for longer runs,
  • Will mostly be running on trails more rocky than average, etc...

...then always opt for the more cushioned option when in doubt.

Now let's talk about some other relatively minor things to consider.

Underfoot protection & durability

Due to the extra cushion, all the Timp revisions will offer greater underfoot protection than all the Lone Peak revisions.

Fit

The Lone Peak 4.5's fit slightly narrower compared to the Timp 2.0's in the upper. Width of the soles are the same (as it's with all the Altra shoes).

As far as the size are concerned, though, they both size up as expected.

Conclusion

If you're either:

  1. Quite a bit on the heavier side (say, more than 190 lbs),
  2. New to running/hiking,
  3. Running/hiking on a relatively more rough and/or rocky trails,
  4. Planning to run/hike mostly for long distances,
  5. Prioritize underfoot protection and cushion over the ground feel,
  6. Wishing to go easier on your joints (for any reason),
  7. Not really wishing much traction...

...then Timp 2.0's can be a really good choice. If your situation doesn't tick these boxes much, than Lone Peak 4.5's can be a great choice.

ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running Shoe
ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running...
(1506)
Buy on Amazon

ALTRA Men's ALM1957F TIMP 1.5 Trail Running Shoe
ALTRA Men's ALM1957F TIMP 1.5 Trail Running Shoe
(444)
Buy on Amazon
ALTRA Women's ALW1957F TIMP 1.5 Trail Running Shoe
ALTRA Women's ALW1957F TIMP 1.5 Trail Running Shoe
(686)
Buy on Amazon

Also, here are two good video reviews:

For Lone Peak 4.5:

For Timp 2.0:

Filed Under: Footwear, Gear Tagged With: altra, altra footwear, altra running footwear, altra trail running footwear, footwear

Altra Lone Peak 4.0 vs 4.5

Last updated: July 21, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

Altra Lone Peak 4.5's.

The five upgrades took place going from Lone Peak 4.0 to 4.5:

  • Improved tow-box durability (the issue with 4.0 is fixed), 
  • New lacing system now allows fine tuning the fit in some subtle ways,
  • More fitted upper,
  • Quicker midsole recovery,
  • Some new extra color options and prettier overall design.

Altra really picked up their design game recently.

This means that going from Lone Peak 4.0 to 4.5, the fit, comfort and durability are improved drastically. 

Outsole equips the very same outer structure so-called "MaxTrac", so unlike other updates like Timp 1.5 > Timp 2.0 and Olympus 3.5 > Olympus 4.0, traction isn't impacted with this one.

This new Grey/Orange color of Lone Peak 4.5 is really liked by many - including me.

ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running Shoe
ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running...
(1506)
Buy on Amazon

Here's my conversation with the awesome Customer Rep Liz

  • 19:33 Liz W.
  • Thank you for contacting Altra! I'd be happy to assist you.
  • 19:33 Canberk
  • Hi Liz! Hope you're having a great day!
  • 19:33 Liz W.
  • Hello Canberk!
  • 19:33 Liz W.
  • I am! How about you?
  • 19:34 Canberk
  • Good, thanks!
  • 19:34 Canberk
  • I'm wondering about the changes took place going from Lone Peak 4.0 to 4.5. Could you help me about that?
  • 19:34 Liz W.
  • I would be glad to help you with that.
  • 19:34 Liz W.
  • The Lone Peak 4.5 has been trimmed down.
  • 19:35 Canberk
  • Could you elaborate?
  • 19:36 Liz W.
  • Of course, makes the shoe more flexible and has have an easier lacing system.
  • 19:37 Liz W.
  • The midsole also recovers more quickly.
  • 19:38 Canberk
  • I see.
  • 19:38 Liz W.
  • Hope that helps!
  • 19:38 Liz W.
  • Is there anything else I can help you with today?
  • 19:39 Canberk
  • Is Lone Peak 4.5 more fitted compared to the 4.0?
  • 19:40 Liz W.
  • Customers have found the shoe to fit more snug.
  • 19:41 Canberk
  • One last question: What about the durability?
  • 19:42 Liz W.
  • The shoe is durable for trails.
  • 19:42 Liz W.
  • This has not changed from the 4 to the 4.5
  • 19:43 Canberk
  • So I guess the upper construction is the same besides the lacing system?
  • 19:43 Liz W.
  • The upper material is also trimmed down.
  • 19:44 Canberk
  • But the material durability is the same I guess.
  • 19:44 Liz W.
  • That is correct!
  • 19:45 Canberk
  • Another Rep named Morgan told me that durability was enhanced from 4.0 to 4.5 as well. So are you sure it isn't changed?
  • 19:46 Liz W.
  • Sorry we did have some issues with toe caps however has been addressed with the 4.5.
  • 19:47 Canberk
  • So the toe-box durability is higher in 4.5.
  • 19:47 Canberk
  • OK, I guess that's all then!
  • 19:47 Canberk
  • What about the traction?
  • 19:48 Liz W.
  • The traction is the same with the Maxtrac. (A perfect combination of grip, traction and durability that will eat up gnarly terrain like a boss).
  • 19:49 Canberk
  • Is MaxTrac better than Vibra Mega?
  • 19:50 Liz W.
  • Virbram is actually better since is also sticky.

Filed Under: Footwear, Gear Tagged With: altra, altra footwear, altra running footwear, altra trail running footwear, footwear

Altra Timp 1.5 vs 2.0

Last updated: July 21, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

Altra Timp 1.5's in action!

Timp 1.5's.

Timp saw an extensive revision going from 1.5 to 2.0, so it deserves its own post.

Summary

The two biggest updates from my perspective:

  • Timp 2.0 now feels a little bit more secure (especially through the mid foot) due to the improved outsole,
  • It feels a little bit more "runnable" when you're on the road and not on the trail.

Lastly, this Grey/Blue color of Timp 2.0 is loved by many (including me) and is also the most preferred color combination. 

Now a little bit more detail than that. 

Altra 2.0's in action.

Traction

The biggest downside of Timp 1.5 was its outdated outsole (which incorporated so called DuraTrac technology) which offered quite poor traction capabilities.

Considering that this is a trail running shoe, this could have and did report some bigger issues than comfort: Safety. Some users reported twisted ankles and some other ankle injuries.

Now the lugs protruding outwards from the outsole got updated to what is called the "MaxTrac" in Altra's terminology, and made up the biggest update going from Timp 1.5 to 2.0.

A huge improvement.

To my knowledge, MaxTrac is the second most recent outsole grip technology used in all the Altra trail running shoes.

Another thing that might have caught your attention on the outsole is the vertical channel starting from the heel and reaching out almost to the midfoot.

This split in half adds to the flexibility, allowing it to move more freely in lateral axis and hence providing extra independent lateral suspension. This means that;

  • On slippery surfaces, you're now much less likely to slip sideways, 
  • Any sort of collision on one side isn't going to be able to affect the other side anymore.

Other minor changes

There are also some subtle changes in the upper, lacing system, foot-shape toe-box and the midsole, but nothing really noticeable in practice for the majority of us.

You can think of the Timp 2.0 as the trail version of the road-running shoe Torin.

Watch the founder of Altra explaining all the changes took place:

Transcription:

  • How's it going guys I'm Connor from Running Warehouse. Today I'm here with Golden Harper founder of Altra and we have the latest update to the Timp series.
  • This is the Timp 2.0. Now just taking a look at this shoe it looks completely new from top to bottom. What is this shoe all about?
  • Yeah so Timp is just an awesome balance of cushioning trail, road to trail comfort all wrapped into one. It's gonna be a great long day shoes (how we've historically pitched this shoe) and put a new traction pattern on it. That's gonna make it great for a wide variety of surfaces.
  • Great great now comparing this to 1.5 like I said it looks very different can you talk about some of the updates?
  • Yes so the Timp 2.0 is gonna have an outsole that's just better multi surface traction to it. Multi-tiered bugs gonna be better for all kinds of conditions. And then put a new upper on it similar to the 1.5 upper in a lot of ways. Really nice balance of comfort and control on this upper. And then with the asymmetric lacing being subtle but they're just really you know this shoes emphasis is comfort for long miles out on the trailer for road to trail and obviously has our signature balance cushioning platform to help improve your running form. Our foot shaped toe box as well to you know just give you more power stability and control at push off and obviously more comfort.
  • That's great now for someone who's maybe been in the 1.5 before what would you say is kind of the biggest change from this update in terms of feel on foot?
  • I'd say it feels a little bit more secure through the mid foot and it feels a little bit more runnable when you're on the road are probably the two biggest changes out there. Also like side to side traction on the trail because of the the way the lugs are set up so those are the biggest changes if you liked Timp or sorry a Torin we're on the road this is basically a trail version of the Torin or a road to trail version of the Torin.
  • That's great that's great now this shoe is gonna be out very soon when when can people get this?
  • The end of 2019 you should be able to pick this up.
  • Perfect, you can check it out at running warehouse!

Filed Under: Footwear, Gear Tagged With: altra, altra footwear, altra running footwear, altra trail running footwear, footwear

Altra Superior vs Lone Peak

Last updated: July 21, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

Altra's new Lone Peak 4.5's (released on 1st of Nov 2019) in action. According to Altra's website, Lone Peak 4.0's are discontinued now (duh) and are also even almost sold out.

I made an extensive research and also contacted the Altra Customer Service about this (find chat history at the bottom - but I've already put together everything he or she (it's "Alex", lol) mentioned).

In summary, being closer to a typical, balanced trail running shoe, Lone Peak 4.5 offers a more cushioned structure and a little roomier fit compared to Superior 4.0, which in the end make Lone Peak 4.5 a better option for high-mileage runs for most people. 

If you think you'll mostly be running low mileage, though; it mostly comes down to your personal preference: Ground feel vs cushioning (more on this in a minute).

Additionally, Lone Peak 4.5 looks quite pretty (this Gray/Orange color of Lone Peak 4.5 is loved by many - including me). 

  • Lone Peak's has seen a revision on Fall 2019!

I laid out all the changes that took place going from Lone Peak 4.0 to 4.5 in this post.

"This means that going from Lone Peak 4.0 to 4.5, the fit, comfort and durability are improved drastically. 

Outsole equips the very same outer structure so-called "MaxTrac", so unlike other updates like Timp 1.5 > Timp 2.0 and Olympus 3.5 > Olympus 4.0, traction isn't impacted with this one."

  • Is it a good idea to hike with Lone Peak's?

Of course, but be aware that there are two Lone Peak configurations out there - one designed for running and the other for hiking:

  • Lone Peak LOW's (running): These are the base models (typically doesn't even have LOW suffix in Altra's site). These are the ones I'm reviewing in this post and although they can be and are being used by hikers, their main design intention is trail running. 
  • Lone Peak MID's (hiking): Altra also offers Lone Peak's with MID adaptations, which are designed specifically for hiking (here's the source at altrarunning.com)!

The first thing you need to know when comparing Lone Peak 4.5 and Superior 4.0 is that they're more alike than they’re not. The differences are minimal, although not non-existent.

#Note: I'm told that the Superior's 2020 revision 4.5's are "soon" to be on the shelves as well. There isn’t a planned release date but it's  supposedly should be in the market "in a few months".

The two most important differences between Lone Peak 4.5 and Superior 4.0 are in their foam cushioning and fit.

  • Best uses - quick answer

Some scenarios where Lone Peak 4.5 (more cushion & roomy fit) would be a better suit:

  • Running mostly high-mileage,
  • Having a higher body-weight (evens out the extra cushion),
  • Running on too rocky trails or any terrain with above-average roughness,
  • Wanting to go easier on your joints for any reason,
  • Having wider feet.

Some scenarios where Superior 4.0 (more ground feel, lighter, more fitted) would be a better suit:

  • Running mostly low-mileage,
  • Want to get more of the feeling of terrain beneath your feet,
  • Wanting to decrease weight as much as possible,
  • Feeling better in a more snug fit.

Let's get to the bolts and nuts of the former first.

Cushioning vs Ground Feel: A Trade-Off

In all cases, there's a trade-off between ground feel and cushioning. The less the cushioning, the more the ground feel (fleet vs float).

Lone Peak 4.5 is placed right in the middle of this trade-off. It's equipped with a moderate amount of cushion. Not too much, not too little. So the ground feel also ended up being average.

This makes Lone Peak 4.5 a more all-round, balanced, safe pick. It performs very well in both ground-feel and cushioning departments - but isn't great in any of them. Depending on a trail runner's personal preferences, needs and desires; this may or may not mean that Lone Peak 4.5 has just the right amount of cushioning.

That said - the more the cushioning, the more comfortable you'll feel during high-mileage runs. That's a fact for the vast, vast majority of us.

The Superior 4.0, on the other hand, is intentionally equipped with a less amount of cushioning - but not by a huge amount than the Lone Peak 4.5.

  • An important comment on durability

Extra cushioning in Lone Peak 4.5 also increases foot protection (cushion always helps with this in any case) and makes it a more durable option than the Superior 4.0.

Lone Peak 4.0 was already more durable than the Superior 4.0, and now, with the Lone Peak 4.5, the difference is stretched out even further.

How will this play out in practice?

The rougher the terrain (or the longer the run), the harsher the trail running shoes are going to be treated. And the harsher they're treated, the more observable and important the durability will come.

After all, it's meant to increase the ground-feel without sacrificing the nice cushion feeling too much.

This is a great trade-off for folks who want to get more of the feeling of earth beneath their feet when running, and hence connect with the activity to its fullest...

...as long as the terrain isn't too rocky to a point where it actually starts hurting your feet and become counter productive AND as long as you won't be running for too long.

How long is too long? If a mileage feels too long for you, then it's too long for you. And if a trail is too long for you, your joints will start hurting quicker due to a lesser amount of cushioning.

Ground feeling is also necessary for muscle - brain feedback loop when running, and hence more of it helps you run better in the long run. But the effect of this isn't noticeable for the vast, vast majority of us.

Superior 4.0's. Less cushioned mid sole offers superior ground-feel compared to the Lone Peak 4.5's.

It absolutely isn't all that aggressive though, oh no. 

Consider the least cushioned Altra trail running shoe, for example.

It offers incredible ground feel, but sacrifices so much more cushioning than the Superior does that I'd only recommend getting it if you really know what you're doing.

THAT would be aggressive. Just like this insanely cushioned Altra trail running shoe.

Summary: Lone Peak is perfectly balanced between ground-feel and cushion trade-off. And Superior is a little bit more on the less-cushion / more-ground-feel side but not by a HUGE amount.

So it's a matter of personal preference. Read more about this here on Altra's own site. 

ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running Shoe
ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running...
(1506)
Buy on Amazon

No products found.

Comfort and Fit

This should single handedly be the single most important factor you should take into account when deciding between these shoes. In fact, when deciding between any shoes.

The reason I didn't mention this any earlier is because (1) it's too subjective to measure & compare and (2) main factors that determine the ultimate comfort of these shoes are either similar or identical: Toe box, width, length, ankle support and drop.

One isn't objectively more comfortable than the other. If you feel fairly uncomfortable wearing Superior 4.0's, then I'd highly doubt getting a pair of Lone Peak 4.5's will solve all your problems and vice versa.

Because it's not THAT drastic of a change.

Width

Lone Peak 4.0 had a wider fit than the Superior 4.0, but it seems like the Lone Peak 4.5 got narrowed down and is now closer to the width of Superior 4.0 (source at altrarunning.com).

However... Superior 4.0 is still slightly more fitted (width isn't the only parameter here) and Lone Peak 4.5 is more roomy.

I'll mention some shared features from now on. If you aren't interested to read this up-coming part, then skip right to the conclusion heading.

Toe-Box

As you might already know, Altra is actually famous for its spacious toe-box. Both the Superior 4.0 and Lone Peak 4.5 offer the same room in the toe-box.

This is especially important during steep descents. Read more about this here on Altra's own site.

Heel to Toe Drop

Both Superior and Lone Peak are zero drop shoes (meaning that the heel and forefoot are positioned at an equal distance from the ground).

In fact, all the Altra shoes are...

Contrary to what some people seem to believe, ample cushioning doesn't necessarily hinder minimal (zero) heel to toe drop.

Superior offers average-low (21 mm total stack height) and Lone Peak offers average (25 mm total stack height) cushioning - while both successfully manage to be zero drop.

Generally speaking, considering human anatomy, yes, everyone should always benefit from zero drop (and you most likely will), but I've seen enough people to believe that it isn't always the case.

Like I said, though, I bet you'll have all your sports shoes transition to drop-zero once you start using them.

Read more about this here on Altra's own site.

Length

Both Lone Peak 4.5 and Superior 4.0 size up just as expected and are identical to one another.

I'd still absolutely recommend you to take a look at Altra's own [Visual] Sizing Guide.

Water resistance

One last point I'd like to make is that the upper of Lone Peak 4.5, "Durable Quick-Dry Air Mesh", is noticeably more water resistant than the upper of Superior 4.0, "Seamless wrap-around engineered knit".

Superior still offers more than enough protection for rain - even heavy rain - but if you think you might step in puddles and get your feet soaked in sometimes when running, then this can be something to consider.

Weight

This one is short. Superior 4.0 is significantly (2.6 oz) lighter {7.9 oz (224 grams) vs 10.5 oz (298 grams)} than the Lone Peak 4.5.

Conclusion

Some scenarios where Lone Peak 4.5 would be a better suit:

  • Running mostly high-mileage,
  • Having a higher body-weight (evens out more cushion),
  • Running on too rocky trails or any terrain with above-average roughness,
  • Wanting to go easier on your joints for any reason,
  • Have wider feet.

Some scenarios where Superior 4.0 would be a better suit:

  • Running mostly low-mileage,
  • Want to get more of the feeling of terrain beneath your feet,
  • Wanting to decrease weight as much as possible,
  • Prefer a snug fit.

Get yours accordingly.

My conversation with the awesome Altra Rep Morgan

I thought some of you guys might be a stranger to the terms and concepts used by the Rep, so I asked about the details even to the most simple things.

Hope this helps you!

20:46 Morgan
Thank you for contacting Altra! I'd be happy to assist you.

20:47 Canberk
Hi Morgan!

20:47 Canberk
Hope you're having a great day

20:47 Morgan
Hello!

20:47 Morgan
Ditto! How can I help?

20:47 Canberk
I'm gathering information regarding the differences between Superior and Lone Peak shoes. I'd appreciate if you could share their technical & practical differences with me, as well as their most suitable intended uses.

20:47 Canberk
Could you help me about it?

20:48 Morgan
Sure! Both are trail shoes, used for running/walking/hiking on trails or anything other than smooth surfaces, but main difference would be the fit and cushion!

  • Lone Peak - MID or LOW?

LOW is for trail running! MID is for hiking. Here's the source at altrarunning.com!

20:48 Morgan
Superior being more fitted and low cushion, while Lone Peaks are more roomy overall and moderate cushion!

20:49 Canberk
By more fitted, do you mean the Superior offers a more narrowed down fit (in width) than the Lone Peak?

20:49 Morgan
Correct.

20:50 Morgan
Width however, will be either D for men, B for women.

20:50 Morgan
But the last would be more fitted, less refined in the heel, and less volume.

20:51 Canberk
What do D and B stand for?

20:51 Morgan
Those are standard widths, B is typically more narrow and D more roomy.

20:51 Morgan
For example, true wide sizes would be 2E or 4E, so D is a step down, and B is two steps down.

20:52 Morgan
I'm sorry, does that make sense?

20:52 Canberk
Haha sorry, I'm a bit lost

20:52 Canberk
Never heard of 2E, 4E, D or B before

20:53 Morgan
So sorry, you should be able to google it but basically, 2E-4E= WIDE, D standard for men, B standard for women.

20:53 Morgan
So if you don't normally buy true wide sizes and are typically in womens sizes, it would be a B width.

20:54 Morgan
If you convert into mens sizing, it would be a D width.

20:54 Canberk
How does this apply to Superior and Lone Peak?

20:54 Morgan
Mens Superior would be a D width, womens would be B.

20:54 Morgan
Same for Lone Peak.

20:55 Canberk
So it's identical in both shoes

20:55 Canberk
Assuming both are either mens or womens

20:56 Morgan
For width, yes. But again, the last (fit) is different, refer back to the fitted vs more roomy.

20:56 Canberk
Yep - now it makes sense. Thanks a lot for taking time to explain all this Morgan!

20:57 Morgan
You're so welcome!

20:57 Morgan
Is there anything else I can help you with today?

21:00 Canberk
Yes, one more thing please! About the cushion, what would be their intended uses?

21:02 Morgan
Definitely up to you, they are trail shoes so most cases are running/hiking/walking, lost of customers use them for hikes like the Appalachian trail, etc. Or there are people even have worn them for daily wear, but of course with the traction on the outsole, you could wear that down faster than if normally on trails like they are intended for.

21:02 Morgan
But definitely up to you!!

21:04 Canberk
Sorry I actually tried to ask about the different amounts of cushioning they use.

21:05 Morgan
Oh so sorry, cushion would be moderate for Lone Peak at stack height 25mm, Superior being low with stack 21mm!

21:06 Canberk
And how would that play out in practice?

21:07 Morgan
It is definitely personal preference, the shoe won't make you do anything special because of the cushion, it would just be what works best for you.

Altra Lone Peak 4.0 to 4.5

21:07 Canberk
OK!

21:07 Canberk
One last question:

21:07 Canberk
What are the upgrades that took place from Lone Peak 4.0 to Lone Peak 4.5?

21:07 Morgan
Definitely durability!

21:08 Morgan
That would be the biggest and basically the only change, other than new colors being introduced.

The three upgrades took place going from Lone Peak 4.0 to 4.5 are (1) improved durability, (2) new lacing system to fine tune the fit and (3) some extra color options. I'm also told that Superior 4.5 is going to be on the shelves "soon". There isn’t a planned release date. I'm only told that it'll be out in the market "in a few months".

21:08 Canberk
And is there going to be a Superior 4.5 on the shelves?

21:08 Morgan
Yes!

21:09 Morgan
No set date at this time, but check back in a few months!

21:09 Canberk
OK - thank you for ABSOLUTELY AMAZING help Morgan

21:09 Canberk
That's it from my side 🙂

ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running Shoe
ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running...
(1506)
Buy on Amazon

No products found.

Also, here are two good video reviews:

For Lone Peak 4.5:

For Superior 4.0:

Filed Under: Footwear, Gear Tagged With: altra, altra footwear, altra running footwear, altra trail running footwear, footwear

Keen Targhee II vs III

Last updated: July 30, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

Men's Targhee III Waterproof MID (boots).

I was this-close to ask about this to the customer service, but then I've found that Keen ALREADY CLARIFIED the differences between Targhee II and III right here...

Wait why didn't any of us come across this before?

Well, because, as strange as it sounds... this information is only available in their DK and GB sites. And NOT in the US site. Yeah. No idea why...

I still wanted to read more about Targhee II and III - and hence contacted the customer service... 

...But I ended up receiving no response whatsoever. I told myself maybe that's because of the holiday period (the employees spending time with their families) and shrugged it off, so I'm not pissed off at them.

January 7th, 2020 Update: I've just heard back from the customer service about Targhee II vs III and shared the back and forth mails in this post.

Women's Targhee II Waterproof.

Let's start with laying out all the Targhee II and III models here with some short notes first.

Note that the notes are my subjective ideas and your mileage may vary.

Shoes:

  • Targhee II Waterproof [Men's - Men's Wide - Women's]: Your best bet for commuting and casual purposes. Fits very well and decent supporting offers highest comfort among other Targhee's. It's also probably the prettiest of all. Women's Magnet/Periwinkle color and Men's Gargoyle/Midnight Navy color are especially loved by many - including me. The downside is that it's less water resistant (if you care about that). 
  • Targhee III Waterproof [Men's - Men's Wide - Women's]: A more stable and water resistant upgrade to the Targhee II above. It's still pretty comfortable, although not as much as the Targhee II.

No products found.

Boots:

  • Targhee II Waterproof MID [Men's - Men's Wide - Women's]: If you're planning to use your Targhee's both casually AND when hiking, this one would be my top recommendation not only among these Targhee's but also probably among most of boots out there. A solid top-notch.
  • Targhee III Waterproof MID [Men's -Men's Wide - Women's]: Your best bet if you'll be almost always hiking with your Targhee's. Women's Weiss (Boysenberry) color and Men's Big Ben/Golden Brown color are especially loved by many - including me.

KEEN Men's Targhee II Mid Waterproof Hiking Boot
KEEN Men's Targhee II Mid Waterproof Hiking Boot
(121)
Buy on Amazon
KEEN Men's Targhee III Mid Height Waterproof Hiking Boot
KEEN Men's Targhee III Mid Height Waterproof...
(14)
Buy on Amazon

#Note: As you see, MID suffix points out to boots. There was a time when Keen used LOW suffix for shoes, but it seems like they changed their mind about it and now don't use any suffix for them.

#Note 2: It also seems like Keen accidentally skipped adding the "waterproof" expression in the title of men's wide option for Targhee II (shoe) in their site.


Generally speaking, regarding both shoes and boots; Targhee II is more comfortable than the Targhee III, and hence a better pick for casual use. But if you'll be hiking out in the nature, superior stability, traction and water resistance of Targhee III pay off on tougher and more slippery terrain.

Read on if you're looking for longer answers.

Targhee III Waterproof MID (boots).

The outsole (the base of any shoe in contact with the ground) of Targhee III MID is more flexible than that of the Targhee II MID.

In addition to this, Targhee III upper leather is equipped with more leather than that of Targhee II (source: keenfootwear.com/targhee/).

If you're unaware, the "upper leather" statement (a.k.a just "upper") refers to the outer footwear construction excluding the sole.

These modifications in Targhee III provide superior traction, stability and water resistance; but they also cause it to sacrifice some comfort and support in return.

These are the 5 key differences between Targhee II and III in practice.

One isn't better than the other, although some recommendations based on the intended uses can be and are given above in the introduction part.

Here is my chat with the customer service

Me:

Hi there,

I'm gathering information for a wide range of possible Targhee II and III buyers (all for possibly different types of purposes), so I'd appreciate if you could share their technical & practical differences with me, as well as their most suitable intended uses. What are the advantages & disadvantages of one over the other?

Thank you!

Canberk

Them:

Hello Canberk,

Thanks for contacting KEEN; hope you had a wonderful holiday and I apologize for the delayed response! The Targhee II and Targhee III are very similar overall. Both shoes are built on the same platform and same footbed. The main points of distinction are the outer appearance, material, and that the II has a slightly wider fit than the III, as well as a stiffer sole.

The Targhee II is our classic hiker. It has a super sturdy sole, wide fit overall, and the widest toe box available. It runs ½ a size small, so you'd want to order up. The Targhee II is a bit stiffer and more supportive, The Targhee III Mid weighs 17.4 oz per shoe

FEATURES

  • 4mm multi directional lugs
  • Contoured heel lockKEEN
  • .Dry waterproof breathable membrane
  • Torsion stability ESS shank

MATERIAL

  • Waterproof nubuck leather upper
  • Non-marking rubber outsole
  • Dual density compression molded EVA midsole
  • Hydrophobic mesh lining
  • Removable metatomical dual density EVA footbed

The Targhee III is a revamped version of the Targhee II. Handles most terrains, is more streamlined, less bulky, and has a more flexible sole (more like an athletic shoe). It has a bit less volume in the toe and has a little bit narrower fit than the Targhee II. Runs true to size. The Targhee III Mid weighs 15.4 oz per shoe.

FEATURES

  • KEEN.DRY waterproof, breathable membrane
  • Leather mud shield offers resilient durability
  • Speed hooks, for easy lace adjustment
  • Injected TPU heel-capture system for stability
  • ESS shank offers lightweight support
  • Resilient, internal shank
  • 4mm multi-directional lugs for traction
  • Cleansport NXTâ„¢ for natural odor control
  • Environmentally-preferred premium leather from LWG-certified tannery

MATERIAL

  • Waterproof leather and performance mesh upper
  • KEEN All-Terrain rubber outsole for higher-traction grip
  • Dual-density, compression-molded EVA midsole
  • Breathable mesh lining
  • Removable, metatomical dual-density EVA footbed

Let us know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime.

Regards,

Kyleen

KEEN Fan Services

Monday–Friday 6am-5pm (PST)

1.866.676.KEEN (5336)
Offering bilingual support in French!
Français - 1.866.489.4159

Conclusion

I'd recommend the Targhee II Waterproof [Men's - Men's Wide - Women's] for casual use and the Targhee III Waterproof MID [Men's -Men's Wide - Women's] for hiking out in the nature. If you'll be doing both, then I'd recommend Targhee II Waterproof MID [Men's - Men's Wide - Women's].

What about EXP and VENT adaptations?

They're equipped with the same outsole design of the Targhee III. The difference is in their uppers.

Here's an excerpt from Keen's own site:

  • Targhee III: The majority of the upper material is leather with a combination of mesh (synthetic).
  • Targhee EXP: The upper material is predominately mesh (synthetic), with leather trim to the collar for added comfort and durability.
  • Targhee VENT: The upper material is mesh panels (synthetic), please keep in mind that this style does not have a KEEN.DRY membrane and therefore may have a more generous fit to that of the Targhee III and Targhee EXP

Size and Fit

Do make sure to check out Keen's own sizing and fit chart here.


I hope this review was helpful for you to understand whether the Targhee II or III would be the best choice for your own needs and desires.

Feel free to ask me any questions or provide feedback and I'll be happy to respond in the comment section below if it's within my knowledge.

Lastly, not that it's important but can be something to consider for some of you: In both men's best seller listings and women's best seller listings provided by Keen's own site, Targhee II is placed right behind the Targhee III.

Thank you for reading.

Filed Under: Footwear, Gear Tagged With: footwear, keen footwear

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2

Primary Sidebar

Crunch Search

About me

Hey, what's up? Canberk here. I try to approach outdoor gear from a scientific point of view. Here's more about me.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Featured Posts

  • Temperature Ratings of Insulated Jackets
  • Best Arc’teryx Jackets
  • Best Patagonia Jackets

window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-GDD0YD30SK');

  • BASICS
  • PRO TIPS
  • GEAR
  • MISCELLANEOUS
  • ABOUT
  • PRIVACY POLICY
We review and compare Altra's Timp and Lone Peak trail running shoes.
Altra Timp 1.5's in action!
Altra Timp 1.5's in action!