footwear

The Ultimate Arc’teryx Size Guide: Jackets, Pants, and Shoes

Last updated: November 14, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

In summary, you can find your most accurate fit by comparing your body measurements to the Arc'teryx size guide. But, as you know, Arc'teryx features different product models having various fits. That's why products' sizing and some tiny details might vary slightly. I'd say you should know them exactly before buying an Arc'teryx product. So, in this post, I've put Arc'teryx size charts and other parameters that you should pay attention to together.

Keep reading to learn how to opt for the right size Arc'teryx jacket, pants, and shoes.

Table of Contents

Arc’teryx Jackets

To find out your Arc'teryx jacket size, you'll need to take measurements of your sleeve, waist, chest, and hip. But how?

Sleeve: With your arm slightly bent and relaxed, run the tape measure from your center back neck to the wrist.
Chest / Bust: Measure under your arms, wrapping the measuring tape around the fullest part of your chest or bust. Don’t wrap too tight.
Waist: Take a measurement around your waist at the narrowest part.
Hip: Measure around your hips at the widest point while standing with your feet hip-width apart.

If you know these four measurements, excellent, you can compare them to the Arc'teryx jacket sizing chart. And then, just choose a jacket that fits you perfectly.

But if your measurements are between sizes on the chart, then round up for a looser fit or vice-versa.

Men's sizes for Arc'teryx jackets range from XXS to 3XL, while women's sizes are XXS to XXL.

Arc'teryx Jacket Size Guide

Size	M-W	EU	UK	Sleeve	Chest	Waist	Hip
	M W
XXS	M	42	32	79 (31)	87 (34.5)	71 (28)	85 (33.5)
XS	M	44	34	81 (32)	92 (36)	76 (30)	90 (35.5)
S	M	46	36	84 (33)	97 (38)	81 (32)	95 (37.5)
M	M	48	38	86 (34)	102 (40)	86 (34)	100 (39.5)
L	M	52	42	89 (35)	110 (43.5)	94 (37)	108 (42.5)
XL	M	56	46	91 (36)	118 (46.5)	102 (40)	116 (45.5)
XXL	M	60	50	94 (37)	128 (50.5)	112 (44)	126 (49.5)
3XL	M	-	-	96 (37.5)	138 (54.5)	128 (50.5)	142 (56)
XXS	W	30	4	72 (28.5)	76 (30)	60 (23.5)	84 (33)
XS	W	32	6	75 (29.5)	81 (32)	65 (25.5)	89 (35)
S	W	36	10	77 (30.5)	86 (34)	70 (27.5)	94 (37)
M	W	38	12	80 (31.5)	91 (36)	75 (29.5)	99 (39)
L	W	42	16	81 (32)	99 (39)	83 (32.5)	107 (42)
XL	W	46	20	83 (32.5)	109 (43)	93 (36.5)	117 (46)
XXL	W	50	24	85 (33.5)	119 (47)	103 (40.5)	127 (50)

* cm (inch)

If you want to buy a product from Veilance (Men's - Women's) or System A (Men's - Women's) lines, you should check out their own sizing charts.

See other Arc'teryx size charts: https://arcteryx.com/us/en/help/sizing

If you have more questions about fit or sizing, you can consult them to a Arc'teryx Virtual Advisor.

Bear in mind that Arc’teryx jackets have different jacket fits, hems, and lengths for different models. So, you should also pay attention to them while buying a jacket.

I recommend you see my Arc'teryx jackets comparison table below. You can also check out arcteryx.com’s own comparison page.

Comparison of Arc'teryx Jackets

Name	List Price (USD)	Type	Activity	Weight	Fit	Sizes	Center Back Length	Discontinued?	M-W
Alpha Parka Men's	999.0	Insulated (Down)	Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Mixed Climbing	805 g / 1 lb 12.4 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	86 cm / 34 in, Drop hem	No	Men's
Alpha Parka Women's	999.0	Insulated (Down)	Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Mixed Climbing	710 g / 1 lb 9 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	77 cm / 30.4 in	No	Women's
Ceres SV Men's	925.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	880 g / 1 lb 15 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL	86 cm / 34 in (Thigh Length)	Yes	Men's
Firebee AR Men's	949.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round		Regular			Yes	Men's
Firebee AR Women's	949.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round		Regular			Yes	Women's
Fission SV Jacket Men's	775.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	890 g / 1 lb 15.4 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	81 cm / 31.8 in (Thigh Length)	No	Men's
Nuclei SV Parka Men's	399.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Mixed Climbing	600 g / 1 lb 5.2 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	81 cm / 31.8 in	No	Men's
Nuclei SV Parka Women's	399.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Mixed Climbing	580 g / 1 lb 4.5 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	70 cm / 27.5 in	No	Women's
Cerium SV Hoody Men's	575.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	415 g / 14.6 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	69.5 cm / 27.4 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Cerium SV Hoody Women's	575.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	395 g / 13.9 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	68 cm / 26.8 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Women's
Kappa Hoody Men's	475.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	755 g / 1 lb 10.6 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	80 cm / 31.5 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Thorium AR Hoody Men's	325.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	490 g / 1 lb 1.3 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Thorium AR Hoody Women's	325.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	420 g / 14.8 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	65 cm / 25.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Thorium AR Jacket Men's	299.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	435 g / 15.3 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Atom AR Hoody Men's	299.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	475 g / 1 lb	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Atom AR Hoody Women's	299.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	410 g / 14.5 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	67 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Atom AR Jacket Men's	279.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	425 g / 15 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Cerium LT Hoody Men's	379.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	305 g / 10.8 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Cerium LT Hoody Women's	379.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	280 g / 9.9 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	63 cm / 24.8 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Nuclei FL Jacket Men's	299.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	325 g / 11.5 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	75 cm / 29.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Nuclei FL Jacket Women's	299.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	285 g / 10.1 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	67 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Atom LT Hoody Men's	259.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	375 g / 13.2 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL, XXXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Atom LT Hoody Women's	259.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	320 g / 11.3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	67 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Atom LT Jacket Men's	239.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	345 g / 12.2 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL, XXXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Atom LT Jacket Women's	239.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	290 g / 10.2 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	67 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Proton LT Hoody Men's	299.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing	375 g / 13.2 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	74.8 cm / 29.4in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Proton LT Hoody Women's	299.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing	320 g / 11.3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	66.5 cm / 26.2 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Proton LT Jacket Men's	279.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing	340 g / 12 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	74.8 cm / 29.4in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Seton Jacket Men's	229.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Around Town	315 g / 11.1 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	70.3 cm / 27.7 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Rico Jacket Men's	249.0	Insulated (Down)	Around Town	325 g / 11.5 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	70 cm / 27.5 in (Centre Back Length)	Yes	Men's
Cerium SL Hoody Men's	359.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	215 g / 7.6 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	69 cm / 27.2 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Cerium SL Hoody Women's	359.0	Insulated (Down)	All Round	205 g / 7.2 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	65 cm / 25.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Proton FL Hoody Men's	259.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	323 g / 11.4 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL, XXXL	77 cm / 30.4 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Proton FL Hoody Women's	259.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	275 g / 9.7 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	67 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Argus Jacket Men's	199.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Running	320 g / 11.3 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Gaea Jacket Women's	199.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Running	265 g / 9.3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L	65 cm / 25.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Atom SL Anorak Men's	209.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	245 g / 8.6 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in	Yes	Men's
Atom SL Anorak Women's	209.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	230 g / 8.1 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	66 cm / 26 in	No	Women's
Atom SL Hoody Men's	229.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	269.4 g / 9.5 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Atom SL Hoody Women's	229.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	All Round	237 g / 8.4 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	66.5 cm / 26.2 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Nexis Jacket Women's	239.0	Insulated (Down)	Around Town	280 g / 9.9 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	62 cm / 24.4in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Semira Jacket Women's	229.0	Insulated (Synthetic)	Around Town	265 g / 9.3 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	63.2 cm / 24.9in (Hip Length)	Yes	Women's
Alpha AR Jacket Men's	599.0	Shell	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Expedition	430 g / 15.2 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	79.5 cm / 31.25 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Alpha AR Jacket Women's	599.0	Shell	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Expedition	340 g / 12 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	69 cm / 27.2 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Alpha SL Anorak Men's	375.0	Shell	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing	209 g / 7.4 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	76.5 cm / 30 in	No	Men's
Alpha SL Anorak Women's	375.0	Shell	Alpine Climbing	180 g / 6.3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	70 cm / 27.5 in	No	Women's
Alpha SV Jacket Men's	799.0	Shell	Rock Climbing / Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Expedition	510 g / 1 lb 2 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	78 cm / 30.75 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Alpha SV Jacket Women's	799.0	Shell	Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Expedition	440 g / 15.5 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	69 cm / 27.2 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Beta AR Jacket Men's	599.0	Shell	All Round	460 g / 1 lb	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	77 cm / 30.4 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Beta AR Jacket Women's	599.0	Shell	All Round	410 g / 14.5 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	69 cm / 27.2 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Beta LT Jacket Men's	399.0	Shell	All Round	395 g / 13.9 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	76 cm / 30 in	No	Men's
Beta LT Jacket Women's	399.0	Shell	All Round	350 g / 12.3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	69 cm / 27.2 in	No	Women's
Beta SV Jacket Men's	675.0	Shell	All Round	495 g / 1 lb 1.5 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	79 cm / 31 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Beta SV Jacket ReBird Men's	675.0	Shell	All Round	495 g / 1 lb 1.5 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	79 cm / 31 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Beta SV Jacket ReBird Women's	675.0	Shell	All Round	435 g / 15.3 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Beta SV Jacket Women's	675.0	Shell	All Round	435 g / 15.3 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Cassiar Jacket Men's	799.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard	820 g / 1 lb 12.9 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL	74.5 cm / 29.3 in (Centre Back Length)	Yes	Men's
Cassiar LT Jacket Men's	599.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard	605 g / 1 lb 5.3 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL	75 cm / 29.5 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Cita Hoody Women's	139.0	Shell	Training/Fitness / Running	120 g / 4.2 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	67.5 cm / 26.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Cita SL Hoody Women's	129.0	Shell	Training/Fitness / Running	65 g / 2.3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	61.5 / 24.2 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Gamma LT Hoody Men's	249.0	Shell	All Round	545 g / 1 lb 3.2 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	76 cm / 30 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Gamma LT Hoody Women's	249.0	Shell	All Round	465 g / 1 lb	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	66 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Gamma LT Jacket Men's	225.0	Shell	All Round	445 g / 15.7 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Gamma MX Hoody Men's	349.0	Shell	All Round	555 g / 1 lb 3.6 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Gamma MX Hoody Women's	349.0	Shell	All Round	480 g / 1 lb	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	65 cm / 25.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Gamma SL Hoody Men's	225.0	Shell	All Round	310 g / 10.9 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Gamma SL Hoody Women's	225.0	Shell	All Round	265 g / 9.3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	65.5 cm / 25.8 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Incendia Jacket Women's	749.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing / Freeride & Freeride Touring	610 g / 1 lb 5.5 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	79 cm / 31 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Incendia One Piece Women's	999.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing / Freeride & Freeride Touring	887.3 g / 1 lb 15.3 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL		No	Women's
Incendo Hoody Men's	139.0	Shell	Training/Fitness / Running	125 g / 4.4 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	(Hip Length)	No	Men's
Incendo SL Hoody Men's	129.0	Shell	Training/Fitness / Running	80 g / 2.8 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	73 cm / 28.75 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Nodin Jacket Men's	199.0	Shell	Hiking / Trekking	155 g / 5.5 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	75 cm / 29.5 in (Centre Back Length)	No	Men's
Nodin Jacket Women's	199.0	Shell	Hiking / Trekking	140 g / 4.9 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	75 cm / 29.5 in (Centre Back Length)	No	Women's
Norvan SL Hoody Men's	325.0	Shell	Training/Fitness	120 g / 4.2 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	77 cm / 30.4 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Norvan SL Hoody Women's	325.0	Shell	Training/Fitness	110 g / 3.9 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L	(Hip Length)	Yes	Women's
Micon Jacket Heather Men's	750.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard / Freeride & Freeride Touring	685 g / 1 lb 8.2 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	83 cm / 32.5 in	No	Men's
Micon Jacket Men's	699.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard / Freeride & Freeride Touring	685 g / 1 lb 8.2 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	83 cm / 32.5 in	No	Men's
Procline Jacket Men's	499.0	Shell	Big Mountain Skiing / Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing / Freeride & Freeride Touring	720 g / 1 lb 9.4 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	76 cm / 30 in	No	Men's
Ravenna Jacket Women's	799.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard	725 g / 1 lb 9.6 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	69.5 cm / 27.4 in (Centre Back Length)	Yes	Women's
Ravenna LT Jacket Women's	599.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard	540 g / 1 lb 3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	69 cm / 27.2 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Rush Jacket Men's	749.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing	590 g / 1 lb 4.8 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	79.5 cm / 31.25 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Rush Jacket ReBird Men's	749.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing	590 g / 1 lb 4.8 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	79.5 cm / 31.25 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Sabre AR Jacket Men's	675.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing	700 g / 1 lb 8.7 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	79 cm / 31 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Sabre LT Jacket Men's	699.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard	660 g / 1 lb 7.3 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	83 cm / 32.5 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Sentinel AR Jacket Women's	675.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing	590 g / 1 lb 4.8 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	72.5 cm / 28.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Sentinel LT Jacket Women's	699.0	Shell	Big Mountain Skiing / Backcountry Skiing / Ski Alpinism	565 g / 1 lb 3.9 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	73.5 cm / 29 in (Centre Back Length)	No	Women's
Shashka Stretch Jacket Women's	499.0	Shell	Ski/Snowboard	670 g / 1 lb 7.6 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	71 cm / 28 in	No	Women's
Solano Coat Women's	279.0	Shell	Travel/Commute / Around Town	365 g / 12.9 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	86 cm / 34 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Solano Hoody Men's	229.0	Shell	Travel/Commute / Around Town	350 g / 12.3 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Solano Hoody Women's	229.0	Shell	Travel/Commute / Around Town	305 g / 10.8 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	68 cm / 26.8 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Solano Jacket Men's	209.0	Shell	Travel/Commute / Around Town	340 g / 12 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Squamish Hoody Men's	159.0	Shell	All Round	140 g / 4.9 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	77.5 cm / 30.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Squamish Hoody Women's	159.0	Shell	All Round	125 g / 4.4 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	65 cm / 25.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Trino SL Anorak Women's	225.0	Shell	Training / Fitness / Running	290 g / 10.2 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	65 cm / 25.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Trino SL Hoody Men's	225.0	Shell	Training / Fitness / Running	340 g / 12 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Venda Anorak Women's	399.0	Shell	Travel/Commute / Around Town	255 g / 9 oz	Relaxed	XS, S, M, L, XL	75.5 cm / 29.7 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Zeta SL Jacket (US) Men's	299.0	Shell	Hiking / Trekking	310 g / 10.9 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	77.8 cm / 30.6in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Zeta SL Jacket (US) Women's	299.0	Shell	Hiking / Trekking	270 g / 9.5 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	69.7 cm / 27.4 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Andessa Jacket Women's	949.0	Shell & Insulated (Down + Synthetic)	Ski/Snowboard	895 g / 1 lb 15.6 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L	67 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Alpha IS Jacket Men's	899.0	Shell & Insulated (Synthetic)	Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing / Expedition	610 g / 1 lb 5.5 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL	78 cm / 30.75 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Norvan SL Ins. Hoody Men's	399.0	Shell & Insulated (Synthetic)	Training/Fitness / Running	270 g / 9.5 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	71.5 cm / 28.1 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Norvan SL Ins. Hoody Women's	399.0	Shell & Insulated (Synthetic)	Training/Fitness / Running	245 g / 8.6 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L	67 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Women's
Macai Jacket Men's	999.0	Shell & Insulated (Down + Synthetic)	Ski/Snowboard	1 kg / 2 lb 4 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	76 cm / 30 in (Centre Back Length)	No	Men's
Macai LT Jacket Men's	799.0	Shell & Insulated (Down + Synthetic)	Ski/Snowboard	855 g / 1 lb 14.2 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	74 cm / 29.1 in	No	Men's
Rush IS Jacket Men's	799.0	Shell & Insulated (Synthetic)	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing	720 g / 1 lb 9.4 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	79 cm / 31 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Sentinel IS Jacket Women's	749.0	Shell & Insulated (Synthetic)	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing	600 g / 1 lb 5.2 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	79 cm / 31 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Shashka IS Jacket Women's	799.0	Shell & Insulated (Synthetic)	Ski/Snowboard / Backcountry Skiing	585 g / 1 lb 4.6 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	70.5 cm / 27.75 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Women's
Thorsen Parka (US) Men's	849.0	Parka	Around Town	1.1 kg / 2 lb 5.4 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	91 cm / 36 in	No	Men's
Therme Parka (US) Men's	699.0	Parka	Around Town	1 kg / 2 lb 4.5 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	85 cm / 33.5 in (Thigh Length)	No	Men's
Piedmont Coat Men's	449.0	Parka	Around Town	515 g / 1 lb 2.2 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	82 cm / 32.25 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Camosun Parka Men's	649.0	Parka	Around Town	960 g / 2 lb 1.9 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	80 cm / 31.5 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Radsten Parka Men's	625.0	Parka	Around Town	745 g / 1 lb 10.3 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	82 cm / 32.25 in (Thigh Length)	No	Men's
Patera Parka (US) Women's	649.0	Parka	Around Town	905 g / 1 lb 15.9 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	93 cm / 37 in (Knee Length)	No	Women's
Radsten Insulated Jacket Men's	575.0	Parka	Around Town	715 g / 1 lb 9.2 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	73 cm / 28.75 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Sensa Parka Women's	599.0	Parka	Around Town	785 g / 1 lb 11.7 oz	Relaxed	XS, S, M, L, XL	86 cm / 34 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Koda Jacket Men's	499.0	Parka	Around Town	720 g / 1 lb 9.4 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	75 cm / 29.5 in (Centre Back Length)	No	Men's
Magnus Coat Men's	549.0	Parka	Around Town	690 g / 1 lb 8.3 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	83 cm / 32.5 in (Upper Thigh Length)	No	Men's
Fraser Jacket Men's	475.0	Parka	Travel/Commute / Around Town	375 g / 13.2 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	71.5 cm / 28.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Keppel Trench Coat Men's	499.0	Parka	Travel/Commute / Around Town	585 g / 1 lb 4.6 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL	94 cm / 37 in (Thigh Length)	Yes	Men's
Sawyer Coat Men's	449.0	Parka	Around Town	435 g / 15.3 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	84 cm / 33 in (Thigh Length)	No	Men's
Andra Coat Women's	449.0	Parka	Around Town	355 g / 12.5 oz	Relaxed	XS, S, M, L, XL	90 cm / 35.5 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Andra LT IS Coat Women's	499.0	Parka	Travel/Commute / Around Town	755 g / 1 lb 10.6 oz	Relaxed	XS, S, M, L, XL	(Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Codetta Cinch Coat Women's	349.0	Parka	Travel/Commute / Around Town	385 g / 13.6 oz	Regular	XXS, XS, S, M, L, XL	81 cm / 32 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Codetta Coat (US) Women's	349.0	Parka	Travel/Commute / Around Town	425 g / 15 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	81 cm / 32 in (Thigh Length)	Yes	Women's
Codetta Cinch H. Coat Women's	425.0	Parka	Travel/Commute / Around Town	415 g / 14.6 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	81 cm / 32 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Durant Coat Women's	599.0	Parka	Around Town	570 g / 1 lb 4.1 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	86 cm / 34 in (Thigh Length)	Yes	Women's
Mistaya Coat Women's	475.0	Parka	Around Town	530 g / 1 lb 2.7 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	92.5 cm / 36.4in (Thigh Length)	Yes	Women's
Nuri Coat Women's	399.0	Parka	Travel/Commute / Around Town	370 g / 13.1 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	90 cm / 35.5 in (Above Knee Length)	Yes	Women's
Sandra Coat Women's	499.0	Parka	Around Town	485 g / 1 lb 1.1 oz	Relaxed	XS, S, M, L, XL	91 cm / 36 in (Knee Length)	No	Women's
Seyla Coat Women's	425.0	Parka	Around Town	511 g / 1 lb 2 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	87 cm / 34 in (Thigh Length)	No	Women's
Wynd Softshell Coat Women's	449.0	Parka	Around Town	660 g / 1 lb 7.3 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	76 cm / 30 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Atom LT Vest Men's	175.0	Vest	All Round	240 g / 8.5 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL, XXXL	74 cm / 29.1 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Atom SL Vest Men's	149.0	Vest	All Round	178.6 g / 6.3 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Atom SL Vest Women's	149.0	Vest	All Round	153.8 g / 5.4 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	66 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Cerium LT Vest Men's	249.0	Vest	All Round	185 g / 6.5 oz	Trim	S, M, L, XL, XXL	72 cm / 28.3 in (Hip Length)	No	Men's
Cerium LT Vest Women's	249.0	Vest	All Round	170 g / 6 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	63 cm / 24.8 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's
Cita Vest Women's	89.0	Vest	Training/Fitness / Running	70 g / 2.5 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	66 cm / 26 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Women's
Incendo Vest Men's	89.0	Vest	Training/Fitness / Running	85 g / 3 oz	Trim	XS, S, M, L, XL	73 cm / 28.75 in (Hip Length)	Yes	Men's
Nexis Vest Women's	189.0	Vest	Around Town	210 g / 7.4 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	62 cm / 24.4i n (Hip Length)	Yes	Women's
Piedmont Vest Men's	249.0	Vest	Around Town	290 g / 10.2 oz	Regular	S, M, L, XL, XXL	70 cm / 27.5 in (Centre Back Length)	No	Men's
Seyla Vest Women's	225.0	Vest	Around Town	230 g / 8.1 oz	Regular	XS, S, M, L, XL	60 / 23.6 in (Hip Length)	No	Women's

If you'd like to see the data sets to Arc'teryx jackets... Jump there:

Arc’teryx Pants

Before buying Arc'teryx pants, you should know various of your body measurements. They're your waist and hip circumferences and the length from your groin to the floor (a.k.a. inseam length).

Waist: Take a measurement around your waist at the narrowest part.
Hip: Measure around your hips at the widest point while standing with your feet hip-width apart.
Inseam: Measure from your groin down the inside leg to the floor while standing. To get an accurate measurement, I'd recommend asking someone to do it for you.

Now compare your measurements to the Arc’teryx pant size chart below.

As with Arc’teryx jackets, if your measurements are between sizes, select the larger size for a looser fit or vice-versa.

Arc'teryx Pant Size Guide

Size	M-W	EU	UK	Waist	Hip	Regular Inseam	Short Inseam	Tall Inseam
	M W
28	M	28	28	75 (29.5)	90 (35.5)	80 (31.5)	75 (29.5)	88 (34.5)
29	M	29	29	78 (30.5)	93 (36.5)	81 (32)	76 (30)	88 (35)
30	M	30	30	80 (31.5)	95 (37.5)	81 (32)	76 (30)	89 (35)
31	M	31	31	83 (32.5)	98 (38.5)	82 (32)	77 (30)	89 (35)
32	M	32	32	85 (33.5)	100 (39.5)	82 (32.5)	77 (30.5)	90 (35)
33	M	33	33	88 (34.5)	103 (40.5)	82 (32.5)	77 (30.5)	90 (35.5)
34	M	34	34	90 (35.5)	105 (41.5)	83 (32.5)	78 (30.5)	90 (35.5)
36	M	36	36	95 (37.5)	110 (43.5)	84 (33)	79 (31)	91 (36)
38	M	38	38	100 (39.5)	115 (45.5)	84 (33)	79 (31)	92 (36)
XXS	M	42	32	71 (28)	85 (33.5)	80 (31.5)	-	-
XS	M	44	34	76 (30)	90 (35.5)	80 (31.5)	75 (29.5)	88 (34.5)
S	M	46	36	81 (32)	95 (37.5)	81 (32)	76 (30)	89 (35)
M	M	48	38	86 (34)	100 (39.5)	82 (32.5)	77 (30.5)	90 (35)
L	M	52	42	94 (37)	108 (42.5)	83 (33)	78 (31)	91 (35.5)
XL	M	56	46	102 (40)	116 (45.5)	84 (33)	79 (31.5)	92 (36)
XXL	M	60	50	112 (44)	126 (49.5)	84 (33)	79 (31.5)	92 (36)
00	W	28	2	61 (24)	85 (33.5)	77 (30.5)	74 (29)	-
0	W	30	4	64 (25)	88 (34.5)	78 (30.5)	74 (29)	-
2	W	32	6	67 (26.5)	91 (36)	78 (30.5)	74 (29)	-
4	W	34	8	70 (27.5)	94 (37)	78 (31)	74 (29)	86 (34)
6	W	36	10	73 (28.5)	97 (38)	79 (31)	74 (29)	86 (34)
8	W	38	12	76 (30)	100 (39.5)	79 (31)	74 (29)	86 (34)
10	W	40	14	79 (31)	103 (40.5)	80 (31.5)	74 (29)	86 (34)
12	W	42	16	84 (33)	108 (42.5)	80 (31.5)	74 (29)	86 (34)
14	W	44	18	89 (35)	113 (44.5)	80 (31.5)	-	86 (34)
16	W	-	-	94 (37)	118 (46.5)	81 (32)	-	86 (34)
XXS	W	30	4	60 (23.5)	84 (33)	78 (30.5)	73 (28.5)	85 (33.5)
XS	W	32	6	65 (25.5)	89 (35)	78 (31)	73 (29)	86 (33.5)
S	W	36	10	70 (27.5)	94 (37)	79 (31)	74 (29)	86 (34)
M	W	38	12	75 (29.5)	99 (39)	79 (31)	74 (29.5)	87 (34)
L	W	42	16	83 (32.5)	107 (42)	80 (31.5)	75 (29.5)	88 (34.5)
XL	W	46	20	93 (36.5)	117 (46)	81 (32)	76 (30)	88 (35)

* cm (inch)

If you want to buy a product from Veilance (Men's - Women's) or System A (Men's - Women's) lines, you should check out their own sizing charts.

See other Arc'teryx size charts: https://arcteryx.com/us/en/help/sizing

If you have more questions about fit or sizing, you can consult them to a Arc'teryx Virtual Advisor.

Arc’teryx uses two different size ranges for the pants models: Numerical and Alpha. And some pants feature regular, short (S), and tall (T) inseam length options.

So, when you check jackets’ size options, you can see letter-letter or number-letter combinations on their product pages. The first shows the size, and the latter is the inseam length symbol.

For example, M S = Medium Size, Short Inseam Length or 36 T = Size 36, Tall Inseam Length.

But, if you see only the size symbol, it means that the pants have a regular inseam length.

That said, the inseam length of various models might vary. So, I suggest you find out this measurement for the product you'll buy. And of course, you should know its pant fit.

See the comparison table below to stay on top of Arc'teryx pants’ inseam length, fit, and more.

Comparison of Arc'teryx Pants

Name	M-W	Type	Activity	Technical Features	Inseam length	Price (USD)	Weight (oz)	Fit	Size (US)	Inseam Length - cm (size)	Main Material	No of pockets	No of color opt.
Acrople Jogger (Men's)	M	Jogger	Around Town / Travel / Commute	B L	R	100.00	8.50	Regular	28 - 34, 36, 38	76 (32)	93% nylon, 7% elastane	2	3
Levon LT Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Around Town	L D	R	130.00	7.40	Regular	29 - 34, 36, 38	Unavail.	93% nylon, 7% elastane	5	3
Gamma Quick Dry Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	All Round	Q L D	R S T	160.00	9.90	Fitted	28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38	81.3 (32)	TerraTex™	5	4
Levon Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Around Town / Travel / Commute	L D	R	139.00	16.60	Tapered leg, Regular	29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36, 38	81.7 (30)	65% cotton, 26% nylon, 9% elastane	5	4
Incendo Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Running / Training / Fitness	B M L	R	129.00	5.80	Tapered leg, Trim	XS - 2XL	79 (M)	Aquarii	2	2
Gamma MX Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	All Round	E T B D S	R S T	299.00	15.20	Trim fit	XS - 2XL	83 (M)	Fortius 2.0™	4	3
Gamma AR Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Hiking / Trekking / Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	E O B D	R	199.00	17.10	Straight leg, Trim	28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38	83.6 (30)	Burly™	3	1
Atlin Chino Pant (Men's)	M	Canvas	Around Town / Travel / Commute	V D	R	139.00	14.80	Straight leg, Trim	29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36, 38	81.3 (32)	65 / 26 / 9% Cotton / Nylon / Elastane	4	3
Micon Bib Pant Heather (Men's)	M	Bib Pant	Freeride & Freeride Touring / Ski / Snowboard	W I B D	R	650.00	21.30	Regular	S - 2XL	82.5 (M)	NP100d 3L Goretex	3	1
Beta SV Bib Pant (Men's)	M	Bib Pant	All Round	W B D	R S T	575.00	22.80	Regular	S - 2XL	84.1 (L)	N80d 3L Goretex Pro + N140d 3L Goretex Pro	1	1
Rush Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Big Mountain Skiing / Freeride & Freeride Touring / Ski / Snowboard	W I B D	R	549.00	22.90	Regular	S - XL	86 (M)	N100d 3L Goretex Pro	1	3
Procline Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Big Mountain Skiing / Freeride & Freeride Touring / Ski / Snowboard	H I B	R	399.00	23.50	Trim	S - 2XL	82.2 (S)	N70p Goretex Infinium	3	3
Trino SL Tight (Men's)	M	Tights	Running / Training / Fitness	O Q I B	R	149.00	8.80	Trim	S - 2XL	80.5 (M)	P50k Goretex Infinium + Teslin™	2	1
Motus AR Bottom (Men's)	M	Base Layer	Running / Training / Fitness	M B	R	79.00	5.10	Ankle length, Trim	XS - 2XL	Unavail.	Phasic™ AR II	0	2
Macai Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Ski / Snowboard	W I B D S	R	575.00	24.70	Trim	S - XL	Unavail.	N80p - X Goretex 2L	2	1
Veilance Spere LT Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Around Town	R	R	300.00	9.00	Regular	29 - 34, 36	Unavail.	Recycled TerraTex™	4	3
Veilance Secant Comp Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Around Town	H E B	R	275.00	7.80	Tapered leg, Relaxed	XS - XL	75.5 (S)	78% nylon, 22% elast. + 87% nylon, 13% elast.	4	3
Veilance Convex LT Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Around Town	R	R	300.00	9.30	Tapered leg, Fitted	29 - 34, 36	Unavail.	Recycled TerraTex™	4	3
Veilance Secant Trackpant (Men's)	M	Jogger	Around Town	R L D	R	275.00	9.30	Regular	XS - XL	Unavail.	78% nylon, 22% elast. + 87% nylon, 13% elast. + Venus Drytech	4	2
Veilance Spere LT Short (Men's)	M	Short	Around Town	B R L	R	250.00	7.90	Relaxed	29 - 34, 36	Unavail.	Recycled TerraTex™	4	3
Veilance Haedn LT Pant (Men's)	M	Trouser	Around Town	H	R	400.00	9.30	Tapered leg, Regular	29 - 34, 36	Unavail.	100% wool	4	2
Veilance Indisce Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Around Town	H I	R	400.00	14.10	Tapered leg, Trim	28 - 34, 36	83.2 (28)	Goretex 3L Infinium	4	2
Veilance Align MX Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Around Town	H E	R	350.00	16.20	Tapered leg, Standard	29 - 34, 36	Unavail.	Burly™	4	3
Sabre AR Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Backcountry Skiing	W I B D	R S T	549.00	21.20	Regular	S - 2XL	Unavail.	N80p - X Goretex with soft shell constr.	3	5
Gamma SL Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	All Round	L D	R S T	160.00	10.20	Tapered leg, Fitted	28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38	81.2 (32)	Aequora AirPerm™	3	4
Gamma SL Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	All Round	L D	R S T	160.00	8.10	Tapered leg, Fitted	00, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12,14,16	Unavail.	Aequora AirPerm™	3	3
Gamma LT Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Hiking / Trekking / Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	O L D	R S T	180.00	12.50	Straight leg, Regular	XS - 2XL	82.8 (S)	Fortius™ DW 2.0	3	4
Gamma LT Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	Hiking / Trekking / Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	O L D	R S T	180.00	10.40	Straight leg, Fitted	00, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12,14,16	82 (8)	Fortius™ DW 2.0	3	4
System_A Eislen Cargo Pant (Men's)	M	Cargo Pant	Around Town / Travel / Commute	R L D	R	250.00	10.10	Relaxed	29 - 34, 36	Unavail.	Fortius™ DW 1.0	4	2
System_A Eislen Cargo Pant (Women's)	W	Cargo Pant	Around Town / Travel / Commute	R L D	R	250.00	8.10	Fitted	0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12	Unavail.	Fortius™ DW 1.0	4	2
Beta LT Pant Hadron (Men's)	M	Pant	All Round	W I B L D	R	350.00	7.80	Tapered leg, Regular	XS - 2XL	Unavail.	Hadron 3L Goretex + Hadron LCP	?	1
Beta LT Pant Hadron (Women's)	W	Pant	All Round	W I B L D	R	350.00	8.60	Tapered leg, Regular	XS - 2XL	Unavail.	Hadron 3L Goretex + Hadron LCP	?	1
System_A Metric Insulated Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	Around Town / Travel / Commute	E R B L D S	R	250.00	10.40	Straight leg, Relaxed	2XS - XL	Unavail.	Fortius™ Air 20	2	2
System_A Metric Insulated Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	Around Town / Travel / Commute	E R B L D S	R	250.00	10.40	Straight leg, Relaxed	2XS - XL	Unavail.	Fortius™ Air 20	2	2
Beta AR Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	All Round	W B L D	R S T	499.00	16.40	Regular	S - 2XL	Unavail.	N80d 3L Goretex Pro	1	2
Beta AR Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	All Round	W B L D	R S T	499.00	15.90	Regular	XS - XL	82 (M)	N80d 3L Goretex Pro	1	1
Beta Pant (Men's)	M	Pant	All Round	W I B D	R S T	275.00	11.60	Tapered leg, Regular	S - 2XL	Unavail.	N70p 3L Goretex with Goretex C-Knit backer techn.	0	2
Beta Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	All Round	W I B D	R S T	275.00	10.90	Tapered leg, Regular	XS - 2XL	Unavail.	N70p 3L Goretex with Goretex C-Knit backer techn.	0	2
Konseal Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	B D	R S T	130.00	10.40	Tapered leg, Regular	00, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12,14,16	Unavail.	66% organic cotton, 20% nylon, 14% elastane	5	3
Essent High-Rise Legging 28" (Women's)	W	Leggings	All Round	V D	R	120.00	5.60	Next-to-skin	00, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12,14,16	Unavail.	Chira™	2	4
Essent High-Rise Legging 26" (Women's)	W	Leggings	All Round	V D	R	120.00	6.20	Next-to-skin	00, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12,14,16	Unavail.	Chira™	2	4
Contenta Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	Around Town / Travel / Commute	B L Q	R S T	120.00	6.20	Tapered leg, Regular	00, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12,14	Unavail.	100% polyester	3	3
Alroy Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	Hiking / Trekking	B L D Q	R S	119.00	7.90	Tapered leg, Trim	0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14	Unavail.	Aequora AirPerm™	5	2
Sentinel LT Bib Pant (Women's)	W	Bib Pant	Backcountry Skiing / Ski / Snowboard	W B D	R	525.00	18.30	Trim	XS - XL	Unavail.	N80p 3L Goretex with Goretex C-Knit backer techn.	2	2
Sentinel LT Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	Backcountry Skiing / Ski / Snowboard	W B D	R S T	499.00	16.80	Trim	0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14	Unavail.	N80p 3L Goretex with Goretex C-Knit backer techn.	3	2
Veilance Logen LT Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	Around Town	B R L	R	300.00	9.50	Wide leg, Relaxed	0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12	50.5 (6)	Recycled TerraTex™	?	2
Iden Pant (Women's)	W	Pant	Around Town	Q	R	99.00	10.20	Tapered leg, Trim	0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14	73 (6)	54% cotton, 41% nylon, 5% elastane	3	2
Veilance Allo Trouser (Women's)	W	Trouser	Around Town	B L	R	400.00	9.00	Straight leg, Relaxed	0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12	Unavail.	Polartec Neoshell®	4	2

If you need extra information, see the product pages of Arc'teryx pants.

Also, you can ask an Arc'teryx Virtual Advisor your questions.

Arc’teryx Footwear

Buying the appropriate size for your feet while shopping online might be challenging. So how will you ensure you buy an Arc'teryx pair that's the right fit?

Easy peasy... Just measure your foot length using a ruler or tape measurer from the heel to the tip of your longest toe. Like in the image on the left. Then find your foot size on the Arc'teryx footwear sizing chart below.

If you can't see the length value you measured on the conversion chart, look at the nearest large value to it.

Speaking of which, Arc'teryx footwear products have a standard width. It's categorized as "D" for men and "B" for women in the North American system.

Arc'teryx Footwear Size Guide

Foot length cm (inch)	M-W	US	UK	EU	Mondo
	M W
25 (9.8)	M	7	6.5	40	25
25.5 (10)	M	7.5	7	40 2/3	25.5
26 (10.2)	M	8	7.5	41 1/3	26
26.5 (10.4)	M	8.5	8	42	26.5
27 (10.6)	M	9	8.5	42 2/3	27
27.5 (10.8)	M	9.5	9	43 1/3	27.5
28 (11)	M	10	9.5	44	28
28.5 (11.2)	M	10.5	10	44 2/3	28.5
29 (11.4)	M	11	10.5	45 1/3	29
29.5 (11.6)	M	11.5	11	46	29.5
30 (11.8)	M	12	11.5	46 2/3	30
30.5 (12)	M	12.5	12	47 1/3	30.5
31 (12.2)	M	13	12.5	48	31
31.5 (12.4)	M	13.5	13	48 2/3	31.5
32 (12.6)	M	14	13.5	49 1/3	32
22 (8.7)	W	5	3.5	36	22
22.5 (8.9)	W	5.5	4	36 2/3	22.5
23 (9.1)	W	6	4.5	37 1/3	23
23.5 (9.3)	W	6.5	5	38	23.5
24 (9.4)	W	7	5.5	38 2/3	24
24.5 (9.6)	W	7.5	6	39 1/3	24.5
25 (9.8)	W	8	6.5	40	25
25.5 (10)	W	8.5	7	40 2/3	25.5
26 (10.2)	W	9	7.5	41 1/3	26
26.5 (10.4)	W	9.5	8	42	26.5
27 (10.6)	W	10	8.5	42 2/3	27
27.5 (10.8)	W	10.5	9	43 1/3	27.5
28 (11)	W	11	9.5	44	28
28.5 (11.2)	W	11.5	10	44 2/3	28.5
29 (11.4)	W	12	10.5	45 1/3	29

See other Arc'teryx size charts: https://arcteryx.com/us/en/help/sizing

If you have more questions about fit or sizing, you can consult them to a Arc'teryx Virtual Advisor.

Arc’teryx US shoe sizes for Men's models range from 7 through 13, while they're between 5 and 10 for Women's. Only Acrux AR Mountaineering (Men’s - Women’s - my review) and Acrux LT GTX (Men’s - Women’s - my review) feature different shoe size ranges.

Comparison of Arc'teryx Footwear Products

Name	M-W	Type	Activity	Waterproof?	Price (USD)	Weight (oz)	Upper	Drop (Stack) (mm)	Review
Norvan LD 3 GTX (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Trail Running	Yes	200	10.00	Mesh	6 (29:23)
Norvan LD 3 (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Trail Running	No	165	10.00	Mesh	6 (29:23)
Norvan SL 2 (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Trail Running	No	160	6.00	TPU mesh	7 (19:12)
Aerios FL MID GTX (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Hiking / Trekking	Yes	185	13.00	Cordura® mesh	9
Aerios FL GTX (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Hiking / Trekking	Yes	170	12.00	Cordura® mesh	9 (27:17)
Aerios FL (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Hiking / Trekking	No	135	12.35	Cordura® mesh with TPU protection	9 (27:17)
Aerios AR MID GTX (Men's - Women's)	M W	Boot	Hiking / Trekking	Yes	260	19.00	100% PFC-free woven polyester	12 (29:17)
Konseal FL 2 Leather GTX (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Hiking / Trekking / Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	Yes	220	13.93	PFC-free split-suede leather	11
Konseal FL 2 Leather (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Hiking / Trekking / Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	No	190	12.70	PFC-free split-suede leather	Unavail.
Konseal FL 2 GTX (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	Yes	175	12.00	Mesh	11	Review
Konseal FL 2 (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	No	145	11.00	60% PA 40% PE mesh	11	Review
Konseal AR (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	No	185	16.00	Nubuck suede leather	11	Review
Konseal LT(Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Rock Climbing / Alpine Climbing	No	140	10.00	Polyester mesh	10	Review
Arakys Approach (Men's - Women's)	M W	Shoe	Rock Climbing / Around Town	No	150	10.00	Ripstop synthetic with TPU protection	10
Acrux TR GTX (Men's - Women's)	M W	Boot	Hiking / Trekking	Yes	250	19.00	SuperFabric®	11	Review
Acrux AR Mountaineering (Men's - Women's)	M W	Boot	Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing	Yes	750	33.00	Goretex 3L with TPU protection + 3D PE foam	Unavail.	Review
Acrux LT GTX (Men's - Women's)	M W	Boot	Ice Climbing / Alpine Climbing	Yes	400	23.00	SuperFabric®	Unavail.	Review

If you need extra info, see my footwear reviews: https://outdoorcrunch.com/category/gear/footwear/

Also, you can check out the product pages of Arc'teryx footwear.

Conclusion

Whether you're running, hiking, or climbing, gear that fits your body can help improve your performance. That’s why, while buying an Arc’teryx product, it’s essential to look into its ultimate size guide.

But the sizing and some features may differ slightly from model to model. So I've done a deep dive into how Arc'teryx items fit. And I've shared all the tips and advice with you in this post.

But if you still need more details about the sizing, you can speak to an Arc'teryx Virtual Advisor.

For more info about the jackets' performance ratings, see my other post: https://outdoorcrunch.com/arcteryx-wiki/

Arc’teryx Konseal AR vs LT vs FL 2 vs FL 2 GTX

Last updated: May 17, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

The Arc’teryx AR, LT, FL 2, and FL 2 GTX all offer great stability best paired with rocky terrain. Yet, it’s the Konseal AR (see image) that marries tacky traction with rugged durability that’s built to tackle technical climbs route after route.

In the Arc’teryx shoe lineup, the Konseal AR, LT, FL 2, and FL 2 GTX fill the niche of tackling the approach. Durable, lightweight, fast, and waterproof, all four of these models have their own perks. What they don’t offer is extra ankle support like the Acrux LT GTX.

In summary, the stiff sole and abrasion-resistant uppers of the Arc’teryx Konseal AR offer rugged durability. What these shoes lack in comfort, the Konseal LT makes up for with every stride. Meanwhile, the biting grip of the Konseal FL 2 and FL 2 GTX beckon your feet to the crag.

Let’s get a closer look at how these options pit against one another.

Comfort

Although the Konseal AR is one attractive-looking shoe, it’s stiff as a board. Same with the Konseal FL 2 and Konseal FL 2 GTX. While this is ideal for lengthy scrambles, it’s a problem when the going gets mellow.

The comfort level will leave you wishing you opted for a wider toe box and more cushioning on flat trails. For comfortable day hiking shoes, you’ll want to use the Arc’teryx shoe finder.

The Konseal LT is precisely the opposite. The breathability and flex of the mesh uppers in combo with the lighter weight provide ample comfort on mellow and rocky terrain.

Arc’teryx even thoughtfully added in a collapsible heel, turning these into slip-ons for lounging around base camp. Of these four options, the Konseal LT is the one I would slap on for a full day of ascending the approach.

Traction

When scrambling around boulders, you need reassurance at your feet. All four of these Arc’teryx approach shoes offer a solid degree of traction. Which, of course, varies with conditions and terrain.

As for the Konseal LT (see image), this shoe surprisingly holds its own among the bunch. The lightweight design and tacky sole offer ample traction on rocky terrain and talus slopes.

For instance, the sticky tread of the Konseal FL 2 clings well to rocks and hard-packed trails, as does the Konseal FL 2 GTX. The biggest difference with this shoe is the Gore-Tex waterproofing adds better traction in wet conditions.

This will likely improve your approach as mother nature releases her furry but to a degree. The design of the shoe leads me to suspect some water may seep in around the tongue, causing some slippage inside.

Meanwhile, what the Konseal AR lacks in comfort, it makes up for in traction. This shoe provides a solid grip on smooth slabs and jagged surfaces. The shallow lugs provide full foot contact allowing you to grab surfaces like a chameleon.

As for the Konseal LT, this shoe surprisingly holds its own among the bunch. The lightweight design and tacky sole offer ample traction on rocky terrain and talus slopes. Just don’t test these when it starts to pour.

Stability

Stiff soles may not be ideal for comfort, but they help with stability. The rigid sole of the Konseal AR does well when the terrain resembles anything but flat.

The Konseal FL 2 hugs the foot with higher synthetic sidewalls that increase stability with each maneuver. Its waterproof counterpart, the Konseal FL 2 GTX, does this and more as it meets the challenge of sloshy conditions with sure-footedness.

And our lightweight friend, the Konseal LT? Even these add stability when precision counts most.

Needless to say, all offer good stability. Yet, if I’m slogging through muddy terrain with a loaded pack, I would go with the Konseal FL 2 GTX.

Durability

For wet and muddy climbs, the Konseal FL 2 GTX (see image) is a better choice.

Slap the Arc’teryx label on anything, and you expect durability. Or so you would think.

Don’t get me wrong; any approach shoes will take a beating. But the Konseal LT may wear out faster than the others. This is mostly due to design.

The collapsible heel leads me to suspect durability issues down the road. Same with the toe cap.

On the other hand, the Konseal FL 2 and FL 2 GTX offer better durability. But like the Konseal LT, I fear the toe cap may eventually separate from the synthetic mesh of both pairs.

Then there’s the Konseal AR. These shoes are built to take some serious abuse. From the abrasion-resistant upper suede to the sole, this is the best option for durability out of the four.

Versatility

The Konseal AR, LT, FL 2, and FL 2 GTX all work for scrambles and climbs. Yet, it’s their technical features that limit their use for varying activities.

The Konseal FL 2 (see image) hugs the foot with higher synthetic sidewalls that increase stability with each maneuver.

The Konseal AR may claim “all-around” use, but the comfort level is less than desirable for the mellow section of a hike. Although, they do look good being sported around town.

The Konseal is the opposite. The comfortable fit and lighter weight can take you from flat hiking to jagged scrambling with minimal compromise. It will let you hop around with agility while you're at it too.

What the Konseal LT doesn’t excel at is scrambling up super slick boulders. For wet and muddy climbs, the Konseal FL 2 GTX is a better choice. Meanwhile, the Konseal FL 2 balances weight with traction to keep you light on the approach.

Conclusion

Approach shoes are best when you need precision at your feet. The Arc’teryx AR, LT, FL 2, and FL 2 GTX all offer great stability best paired with rocky terrain. Yet, it’s the Konseal AR that marries tacky traction with rugged durability that’s built to tackle technical climbs route after route.

Arc’teryx Acrux TR GTX vs LT GTX vs AR

Last updated: May 17, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

The Acrux TR GTX (see image) is better for multi-day hikes where the trail can go from dirt to rugged slopes. This is more akin to what most hikers would need who get technical from time to time.

Climbing technical terrain? The Arc'teryx Acrux TR GTX, LT GTX, and AR feature an earth-biting grip. What these boots don’t offer is agility. For that, you’re much better off with the Arc’teryx Aerios FL MID GTX.

The Arc’teryx Acrux TR GTX, LT GTX, and AR are built for technical climbs. The Acrux TR GTX can handle varying terrains on multi-day hikes. For jagged rocky peaks, the Acrux LT GTX is a great match. Meanwhile, the Acrux AR has enough warmth and stability to tackle icy routes.

Comfort

Finding a technical boot that is functional and comfortable is challenging. The Acrux TR GTX solidifies that point.

The comfort of the Acrux TR GTX is about subpar. The cushion on the midsole is not as thick as I’d like considering these are designed for rocky terrain. The fit is also tighter than I typically go for. Which, in my experience, means blisters.

What I do like about the Acrux TR GTX is the rubber toe cap. This means you’re much less likely to be cursing the trail when you stub your toe on a rocky ascent.

The Acrux LT GTX is pretty brand spanking new to the Arc’teryx lineup. From first impressions, these boots are stiff where you need it and flexible where you want it.

They do offer a degree of breathability, which is always appreciated. Unfortunately, just like the Acrux TR GTX, the Acrux LT GTX has a narrow fit. So wide feet need not apply.

As for the Acrux AR, these boots are surprisingly comfy. Don’t get me wrong; they’re not like slipping into a pair of Crocs.

But, the combo of the flexible inner bootie, warmth, and lighter weight makes them more comfortable than other options.

Break them in over a season, and they’ll grow more comfortable over time. Of course, like my prior complaint, I do wish they offered a wide version.

Stability

Aside from comfort, stability is one of the most important features of a technical boot. The Acrux LT GTX offers some excellent heel-to-toe stability. Just try it out on a talus slope.

The Acrux TR GTX and AR also offer stellar stability. However, some minor improvements could be made.

For instance, the Acrux LT GTX could use a wider outsole to better avoid ankle rolling.

As for the Acrux AR, it could take a lesson from the Acrux LT GTX and incorporate some eyelets and lacing that go higher up the tongue.

All that said, I’d still take any of these options on technical climbs and maintain confidence in stability.

As for the Acrux LT GTX (see image), this is certainly an alpine boot with a sole that’s got a bite. On rocky scrambles, you’ll get a good toehold, even on edges. While this is great, it is very technical.

Traction

Let’s get one thing straight. The Arc’teryx Acrux AR is made for ice climbing.

A good portion of the time, you’ll be heavily relying on crampons. For the times you’re not using crampons, the anti-slip tread provides reliable traction.

Unlike the Acrux AR, the Acrux TR GTX is not made for ice. What it is made for is more mixed terrain that varies from dry to wet conditions.

The Acrux TR GTX has a grippy sole that does well on talus slopes and stream crossings. I’m also digging the deep lugs, which provide sure footing.

As for the Acrux LT GTX, this is certainly an alpine boot with a sole that’s got a bite. On rocky scrambles, you’ll get a good toehold, even on edges. While this is great, it is very technical.

If you’re trekking in varying terrains, I’d go with the Acrux TR GTX.

Use

Arc’teryx claims all three of these boots are built for alpine environments and rock climbing. Which they are, but to a different degree.

The Acrux AR is purely for mountaineering. Find yourself in sub-zero temps with an ice axe in hand, and you’ll want these on your feet.

The Acrux TR GTX is better for multi-day hikes where the trail can go from dirt to rugged slopes. This is more akin to what most hikers would need who get technical from time to time.

For those who really like to scramble up the ascent, the Acrux LT GTX would be a better bet.

Due to the technicality, I wouldn’t recommend any of these for an average, all-around hiking boot. But out of the three, the Acrux TR GTX does have the most versatility.

The Arc’teryx boot finder is a useful tool if you need help deciding.

Value

The Acrux AR (see image) has enough warmth and stability to tackle icy routes.

Your feet are your biggest tool when doing any sort of trekking. I would personally pay top dollar to keep mine in working condition, blister-free.

All three of these technical trekking boots come at a high price. This is precisely what you should expect from anything sporting the Arc’teryx label.

So bottom line, the Acrux AR boots are much harder to slip on than the TR GTX or LT GTX. They also may have some durability issues with the toe. However, they provide exceptional warmth and reassurance when you’re mountaineering.

The TR GTX will offer the most versatility. However, the technical features may be overkill for those who aren’t looking to do multi-day backpacking.

The new LT GTX is a very stylish boot. But, these puppies are too new to see how they’ll withstand some serious trail abuse throughout a season.

Although, if you’re looking to start doing some rocky peak bagging, this could be a good investment for you.

One thing to keep in mind is all these shoes have a narrow fit. If you have wider feet, all the drool-worthy specs will be useless to you.

Conclusion

The Arc’teryx Acrux TR GTX, LT GTX, and AR all have some promising features. Where they fall short is on the narrow fit.

For those who don’t need a wide fit, these technical climbing and trekking boots could be a good choice.

For more versatility, the TR GTX is a solid option. For scrambling, the lugs on the Acrux LT GTX provide great bite. And anyone looking to brave mountaineering can appreciate the warmth of the Acrux AR.

Need a warm jacket to go with your technical climbs? Check out my review for Best Arc’teryx Jackets.

Adidas NMD vs Ultraboost

Last updated: July 14, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

If you're aiming for comfort and/or versatility, Ultraboost is your pick.

NMD and Ultraboost are two of the best selling Adidas products.

I'd say the first thing you should know about them is that UB's are superior to NMD's in all cases except cold/damp weather use.

In summary, if you'll be running with your new shoes even just for a few times, absolutely get the Ultraboost and NOT THE NMD.

For every purpose other than running I'd still recommend the Ultraboost - but unlike running, NMD's can be a good alternative this time. For cold/damp weather use, NMD's can even be superior to UB's.

Don't forget to check out Adidas' very own Shoe Finder tool as well.

Information given in this article is only applicable to UB 16, 17, 18, 19 20, DNA & PB and NMD R1 & R1 V2.

Let me tell you this first:

Ultraboost beats NMD in almost all departments: Comfort, versatility, breathability and (to most people) looks.
Weather resistance is the only thing where the NMD's perform superior to the UB's.
As for durability, I'd say they score about the same - both are robust.

UB (Ultraboost) has born as a technical running shoe originally back in 2014.

However, it has now morphed into a fashion favorite modern icon and even started to offer other alternative line: DNA and PB.

Comfort

Ultraboost would probably be the single most comfortable shoe you'll ever own.

In Adidas' entire running footwear line, the UB's come with the softest sole and highest traction.

In order for you to be able to make a healthy comparison around the comfort levels of NMD vs Ultraboost, you need to understand what is it that drives total comfort in shoes first.

The answer is pretty straightforward: It's all in the cushion.

Generally speaking, the amount of cushioning (a.k.a stack height) determines the balance between comfort and energy return.

The more the cushioning, the more the comfort but the less the energy return.

So it's a trade-off. You can't have both.

This is why long distance running shoes come with abundant cushioning. It proves more potential last without flattening out for hours. Fewer cushioning on the other hand wouldn't have enough time to recover back to its original stack height.

Whereas for sprints, the runners take more advantage of minimalist shoes. Because in shorter distances, energy return starts becoming a higher priority than long-term comfort.

To my knowledge, here are the two main reasons for losing energy return significantly with a more cushioned shoe:

Physiological reason: Higher number of total area inviting more energy leakage when running.
Psychological reason: The more the feedback your mind receives from beneath your feet, the more efficient the mind-feet connection gets.

This trade-off is more aggressive for shoes with soles made of standard EVA foam. Meaning that it's more difficult to benefits from both worlds at the same time.

And what about Adidas UB and NMD?

Enter "boost" technology.

Based on a new chemical process developed in partnership with BASF, the chemical company, solid granular material (TPU) is turned into thousands of energy capsules which make up the footwear's distinctive midsole - as you can see in the image.

With their unique cell structure, these energy capsules store and unleash energy more efficiently in each stride.

Versatility of Ultraboost 20. Just as good for the streets.

It's still impossible for boost technology (or any other technology for that matter) to excel in both comfort and energy return departments at the same.

But it manages to deliver both of them at an impressive level. A level that's impossible for shoes with soles made of standard EVA foam.

Now...

Although both NMD and Ultraboost are equipped with this cutting edge sole, Ultraboost is equipped with more boost particles than the NMD.

In Adidas' entire running footwear line...

...the UB's come with the softest sole and the highest traction.

In the end, Ultraboost provides more comfort AND more energy return than the NMD.

This is why Dennis Kimetto, who professionally runs with Ultraboost's, set a new world record in 2014 Berlin Marathon with them.

I'm not planning to make this a scientific article, so I'll stop here.

NMD R1. Translucent overlays on top of the soft and supportive knit upper help keep rain out.

Breathability

Ultraboost is more breathable than the NMD.

If you've never worn any shoes with a breathable upper before, then I think this will be one of the most surprising aspects of UB for you.

Keeping you less sweaty and more ventilated, I find breathable upper fabric add to the shoe's comfort as well.

The only time this becomes a problem is when it's cold out - which, in my opinion, is the only scenario where the NMD's can be a superior alternative to Ultraboost.

Durability & Versatility

I've used one Ultraboost 16 and one 17 until now. They're still almost just as new.

I ran, lifted and hiked in them but mostly used them for casual purposes.

Having quit my white collar job 6 months ago, now I wear them even more and I don't even look for other shoes.

Lifting in UB 20's.

It has been 2 years since I bought both of them and the technical aspect is just as new.

I expected the cushioning to wear out by time - especially I squat relatively heavy with them {(up to 300 lbs (135 kg)} but from what I can tell that did not happen.

The foam sole of both my shoes are white, so the looks obviously started to suffer but I didn't clean them by any means. Never treated them gently either. I still like how they look though.

Conclusion

Does it worth paying the extra for Ultraboost?

As long as you care about the comfort, looks and breathability (you do); I'd say yes.

adidas Men's Ultraboost 20 Sneaker

adidas Women's Ultraboost 20 Running Shoe

(3)

Can I get NMD's and be just fine?

NMD's are still more comfortable than some other shoes out in the market - but absolutely nowhere near the UB's.

adidas Originals Men's NMD_R1 Boost Shoes

(15)

adidas Originals Women's NMD_R1 Boost Shoes

(2)

What if I'll be traveling?

If you think it'll be raining for quite a bit, then NMD's can probably be a better choice. Otherwise I'd recommend the UB's as always.

Altra Olympus vs Lone Peak

Last updated: July 19, 2022 by Canberk Koksal

#Note: I'll compare both the Olympus 3.5's and 4.0's to the Lone Peak 4.5's in this post. However, I also laid out the differences between Olympus 3.5 and 4.0 as well as the differences between Lone Peak 4.0 and 4.5, so check them out if you're interested.

Lone Peak 4.5's in action.

The most important difference between Olympus and Lone Peak is in their cushioning (as it's the case with almost all Altra trail running shoes).

In summary, with everything else being average; if you're mostly going to be backpacking, trail running, walking and/or standing uninterruptedly, for long periods of time; then you're highly likely to benefit a lot from the extra cushion Olympus has over the Lone Peak's.

In Altra's trail running line, Lone Peak's are the closest you get to a typical trail running shoe and hence a safer choice than the Olympus and is probably a better option for beginner folks.

Additionally, Lone Peak 4.5 looks quite pretty (this Gray/Orange color of Lone Peak 4.5 is really liked by many - including me).

If you think you're in somewhere between these two points, then checking out my Timp 2.0 review as well as my comparison of Timp's to Lone Peak's can be a good idea.

In fact, comparing one of these trail running shoes to Timp's, rather than to each other, would make more sense, but never mind...

Cushion

While it's true that more cushion generally results in more comfort as either the distance to cover gets longer, or the individual gets heavier, or the trail gets rockier etc...

It's a myth that more cushion generally results in less damaging to our joints.

I wanted to make this clear before we get to compare these two products because cushioning would be my single most important criteria when deciding between them - although joint health shouldn't be counted as a criteria.

So, with everything else being average; if you're mostly going to be backpacking, trail running, walking and/or standing uninterruptedly, for long periods of time; then you're highly likely to benefit a lot from the extra cushion the Olympus possesses over the Lone Peak's.

Olympus 4.0. On the shelves around summer 2020.

If you're to be participating ultramarathons with these shoes, then generally speaking, I'd probably draw the maximum event distance line for Lone Peak's at 50 miles (80 km's). Anything longer and you're likely to wish having more cushioned kicks such as the Timp or Olympus.

This is NOT to say that Lone Peak's are an objectively better choice when you're below that limit. Because, if you're a relatively heavy person, more than, say, 200 lbs (90 kg); or the trails you'll cover will mostly be fairly rockier than average; or you're fond of having more underfoot protection for any reason etc...

...then a more cushioned alternative such as the Timp or Olympus can still be a reasonable choice.

BUT...

One strong downside of ample cushion is weaker toe-off when running - which is kind of important when running longer distances, and definitely important when running shorter distances.

Olympus 3.5's.

If you're unaware, here's what toe-off means: Pushing the ground farther from yourself not only using your entire forefoot but also your toe strength. Yes, this results in minuscule differences, but it adds up when you're competing with milliseconds (hint: Shorter distances).

This is the biggest downside of extra cushion.

After reading the entire thing until here, if you think you're somewhere between these two pairs, then I'd probably recommend you to check out the Timp 2.0's. It's probably what you're looking for.

This is it for the cushion part.

Now...

I'd even go that far and recommend you to downright IGNORE EVERYTHING else such as traction, fit, breathability, durability etc...

Not because they aren't important (they are), but because they don't differ much in our case - especially when compared to how cushioning differs.

Men's Lone Peak 4.5 & Olympus 3.5:

No products found.

Women's Lone Peak 4.5 & Olympus 3.5:

ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running...

(1506)

That said, I'll try to hit the most important points there.

Traction

Olympus 4.0 equips the most recent, so-called "Vibra Mega" grip technology of Altra. Compared to the outdated "DuraTrac" of Olympus 3.5's, this is a HUGE step forward. Going from 3.5 to 4.0, the lugs also seem to have increased especially through the mid-foot.

"MaxTrac" outsole of Lone Peak 4.5's is undoubtedly better than Olympus 3.5's "DuraTrac".

However, "Vibra Mega" of Olympus 4.0 still shines thorough even when it's compared to the "MaxTrac" of Lone Peak 4.5's - owing to its extra capability that somehow "sticks" to the ground.

But... that's the case when things are kept technically.

In practice, with everything else being equal, higher stack height usually also means lesser traction in many cases. Extra cushion that the Olympus 4.0 has over the Lone Peak 4.5's evens out its advantage, resulting in more or less equal traction capabilities in practice.

So, in traction department, it's safe to say Olympus 4.0 = Lone Peak 4.5 > Olympus 3.5 for most of the cases.

Conclusion

I'd highly recommend you to base your decision primarily off the cushion differences.

If you're going to be participating to an ultra-marathon, absolutely check out the event distance & the chart in the introduction and pick accordingly.

In summary, with everything else being equal and average, if the event distance is more than, say, 75 miles (120 km); then the Olympus is likely to be a better choice over the Lone Peak's because of its extra cushion.

If you won't be participating to ultramarathons...

In Altra's trail running line, Lone Peak's are the closest you get to a typical trail running shoe and hence a safer choice than the Olympus and is probably a better option for beginner folks.

Men's Lone Peak 4.5 & Olympus 3.5:

No products found.

Women's Lone Peak 4.5 & Olympus 3.5:

ALTRA Women's AL0A4QTX Lone Peak 4.5 Trail Running...

(1506)