Arc'teryx took input from their sponsored athletes and made notable changes to their long-distance trail running shoe. Here is a look at what has been updated on the Arc'teryx Norvan 4 along with our first impressions having spent a lot of time in the previous Norvan LD 3 model.
We'll run on these three pair in 2025. From left: the Women's Norvan 4, Men's Norvan 4, and the Men's Norvan 4 GTX
I have over 150 miles on dirt with the Arc'teryx Norvan LD 3 GTX (see the full review), so I'm very interested to see some significant changes for 2025 across the Norvan line. We just got our hands on a few pairs of both mens and womens Norvan 4, both standard and GTX. We'll be putting them through their paces, but here is a first look at the shoes and what has changed.
Q: Where does the name Norvan come from?
A: North Vancouver, which is the testing grounds of Arc'teryx product designers.
Norvan 4 and Norvan 4 GTX
Long distance trail running
Lightweight, supportive GORE-TEX shoe for lasting comfort on extended trail runs
The women's Arc'teryx Norvan 4 long distance trail running shoe in Pink Glow / Lt Pink Glow.
The men's Arc'teryx Norvan 4 GTX long distance trail running shoe in Stone Green.
Norvan 4
Norvan 4 GTX
Arc'teryx Norvan 4 Updates
The two big performance changes are in stack height and fit. The difference between the women's and men's versions are colors and sizing, so everything in this article is applicable to both.
My Arc'teryx Norvan LD 3 GTX (left) side-by-side with the new Norvan 4 GTX
Stack height and cushion
Arc'teryx Norvan 4 stack height: 25mm : 19mm Midsole density: 45c
Arc'teryx Norvan LD 3 stack height: 29mm : 23mm Midsole density: 42c
While the Norvan 4 still offers a 6mm drop from heel to toe, the stack height has been reduced 4mm, from 29mm at the heel to 25mm. The toe now has a 19mm stack height. Arc'teryx says that their athletes wanted more stability. I'm very curious to get these onto some steep terrain, because I found the Norvan LD 3 to be a very stable shoe to begin with. Remember that more stack height and cushioning does not mean less injuries. This article from Marathon Handbook has a good summary of this topic as well as linking to some great paid journal articles if you want to dive into this topic. An average stack height is 26mm at the heel and you can go maximalist with something like the Hoka Bondi which has a massive 36mm stack. While the Norvan LD 3 has a slightly above average stack height, it is now firmly average.
The density of the midsole has also increased, making it slightly more firm. The midsole on the previous model was a 42c, which has been increased to 45c. This hardness is measured on the Shore scale. Shore C is used for medium-density rubbers. The outsole and midsole will have different hardness, so this is not a direct indication of comfort. The Norvan 4's 45c is on the stiffer-end for a midsole and I assume has been increased in the name of stability.
Optimized fit
Arc'teryx changed the fit on the Norvan 4 to increase heel lock and lessen toe bang.
The other athlete feedback that Arc'teryx received was that toe bang needed to be reduced. This was my big complaint when testing the LD 3. I ran in the LD 3 just this week and still can't say that I feel my heels slip, but on a steep descent last summer I developed a small blister on my 4th toe from hitting the front of the shoe.
These shoes are what Arc'teryx calls their "Comfort Fit". I tend to size down a half-size U.S. because I like a more Performance Fit. I talk about this in detail in my review of the Arc'teryx Sylan trail running shoes. Take a minute and jump to that section of the article to learn about how these shoes fit.
Other changes
- The Aeroprene tongue is gone and replaced with a flat knit tongue to improve fit and lockdown.
- The material on the upper is now PFC-free, which is always welcome.
- The lug pattern is updated slightly on the Vibram® Megagrip outsole. This is a custom design by Arc'teryx and they have a webpage dedicated to how they developed it.
- Lace holes on the GTX have been eliminated and replaced with webbing loops on the underside of the upper.
The tongue has been updated. You can also see that Arc'teryx eliminated the lace holes on this GTX version.
The lug pattern is updated slightly on the Norvan 4, but it is the same Vibram® Megagrip outsole with LITEBASE.
There are some great deals on the remaining stock of the Norvan LD3
First Impressions
My Norvan 4 GTX is a 10 U.S. (28c), matching what I have in the Norvan LD 3. Initial fit feels great. I ended running the lace through the second hole at the ankle and back through the first to get a snug fit. I took these on a 2.5 mile mixed-surface shakedown run. I don't immediately notice the reduced stack height, but the shoe definitely feels slightly stiffer. I over-pronate and the Norvan LD 3 has worked great for me and my initial impression if that the Norvan 4 will be the same. I'm looking forward to testing the stability of this new version on rougher terrain.
The men's Arc'teryx Norvan 4 long distance trail running shoe in Verve / Ginger
More to come
We'll be training and possibly even racing in these this season. We'll update this article with firsthand feedback from the guys and gals on trail.
Check out more trail running coverage
Arc’teryx Shoes | Sylan, Sylan Pro, and Sylan GTX Review
Trail testing the Sylan Pro, the Arc'teryx shoes built for fast mountain
Arc’teryx Shoes | Comprehensive 2024 Guide
Some of the new 2024 Arc'teryx shoes are the brand's first to
Arc’teryx Shoes | Norvan LD 3 GTX Review
Putting trail miles on the waterproof running shoe from Arc'teryx that is
Altra Olympus vs Lone Peak
The Altra Lone Peak is an excellent choice for any novice trail
Altra Timp vs Lone Peak
Altra Lone Peak 4.5's in their natural habitat.A short answer first:The most
Altra Superior vs Lone Peak
Altra's new Lone Peak 4.5's (released on 1st of Nov 2019) in